Atlas Redistricting Commission (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:09:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Atlas Redistricting Commission (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Atlas Redistricting Commission  (Read 7388 times)
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« on: September 23, 2021, 06:03:01 PM »

Did you need to ask?
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2021, 04:30:52 PM »

Ok, here are my ideas about guidelines. I think that we should keep them relatively "open":

Population equality
District population must not deviate from the state average by more than 1,000. For districts that consist of only whole counties a deviation of 4,000 is allowed. For districts in New England that consist of only whole towns a deviation of 2,000 is allowed.

Too high. I'd shoot for 100 w/ splits/500 without.


Integrity of administrative divisions
Counties and cities shall not be unnecessarily split. As a rule of thumb there shall not be more county splits than districts. (For counties that have more than one district quota, you get one free split for every full quota. A three-way split counts as two splits, a four-way split counts as three splits, etc.)

Too inflexible. Counties are bad indicators of COI a lot of the time and extra county splits may be necessary in places for VRA compliance (eg North Carolina).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.