Is veal cruel? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 10:11:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Is veal cruel? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...
#1
Yes (Vegetarian/Vegan)
 
#2
No (Vegetarian/Vegan)
 
#3
Yes (Non-Vegetarian/Vegan)
 
#4
No (Non-Vegetarian/Vegan)
 
#5
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 61

Author Topic: Is veal cruel?  (Read 2336 times)
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,269
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

« on: September 12, 2021, 07:41:01 AM »

These articles summarize the issue best:

Quote
Veal is the meat from a male calf up to 16 to 18 weeks old. It is not fed any grains or grasses, which gives its meat a delicate texture and a creamy pale color with a grayish-pink hue. Beef, on the other hand, is the darker, red meat from older animals.
https://www.allrecipes.com/article/what-veal/

Quote
The lack of iron also causes the calves to suffer from anemia, which gives the animals their prized white flesh whilst making the calves lethargic, weak and unwell. The veal industry purposefully breeds these animals to suffer perpetual illness and malnourishment, a practice which can only be called “cruel.”
https://sentientmedia.org/what-is-veal/

Consider the lobster calf.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,269
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2021, 11:40:52 PM »

Certainly there are cruel ways of producing veal, but the industry is improving for a variety of reasons tho it certainly has room to improve.  Keeping in mind that for the calves mainly used to make veal, male calves from dairy cattle breeds, if veal were banned or no longer economically viable, they'd by and large be killed shortly after birth. There's no economic reason for them to be raised for beef. Hence no one should be under the illusion that ending the human practice of veal consumption would allow male dairy calves to grow to adulthood.

So the question is: can veal be produced in a non-cruel manner and still be economically viable?

I support banning veal crates and veal tethering. I don't know enough to know whether milk-fed-only veal should be banned. But I see no reason to ban veal in all its forms.

The malnourishment and stunted physical development is what gives the veal its unique flavor. (I have never eaten veal myself, just quoting from the sources.) If you ban crates or tethering and require proper nutrition, the calf will be less valuable (maybe slightly more so than regular beef, if that) because the cruelty is literally what gives the veal its taste. But if you support banning cruelty against baby cows, you support banning veal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.