I read the court's order regarding Texas SB8, the paper writ of erasure fallacy
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/URLs_Cited/OT2017/16-476/16-476-3.pdfand some legal analysis. If I understand correctly,
1, the judicial has no power to nullify a duly enacted statute, no matter how unconstitutional it is. What it can do is to enjoin the one sued from enforcing the statue.
2, those not sued are not bounded by the court's order to not enforcing the statue.
If so, even without the creative SB8, there are already problems.
Say AL passed a law banning all abortions, and ordered the state police to close any abortion clinics. Planned parenthood sued the AG Tom, and the court declared the law unconstitutional, and enjoined Tom from enforcing it.
1, Tom resigned and Peter becomes the next AG. Since he was not sued and the order did not include his name, why is he bounded by the court's order that enjoined Tom from enforcing it?
2, Peter orders state law enforcement to stop enforcing that law. But some policeman John decided to ignore Peter's order, and closed several abortion clinics, claiming he was enforcing the law. What can be done against John? And based on what?