IL: An anti-bellwether?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2025, 06:25:00 PM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  IL: An anti-bellwether?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IL: An anti-bellwether?  (Read 501 times)
CentristRepublican
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 07, 2021, 12:50:04 AM »

Illinois is trending very weirdly.

  It shifted very slightly rightward in 2020, despite the Chicago suburbs shifting leftward, and the fact that (obviously) Biden clearly outperformed Clinton, both nationally and in the rest of the Midwest. Just five other states (UT, because of the reverse-McMullin effect, FL, NV, AR and CA shifted rightward.

  On the other hand, it trended slightly leftward from 2012 to 2016, despite the fact that the nation, and particularly the Midwest (all of Illinois' neighbouring states shifted at least 7 points to the right from 2012 to 2016), trended rightward in 2016, and the fact that the 2012 Democratic candidate (Obama) was an Illinoisan himself.

  Is there any way to explain this? What's going on with IL?
Logged
seeking mystical annihilation
discovolante
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,437
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -8.13, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2021, 07:05:13 AM »

2016 was a combination of the suburbs reacting poorly to Trump and the bottom falling out downstate slightly less than would have been expected, probably helped by the relatively unpopular Mark Kirk's underperformance there in the concurrent Senate race. The trends in 2020 were typical of the nation at large, with the downstate R trend strong enough to blunt Chicagoland somewhat and a much more nationalized Senate race against the heavily entrenched Durbin. In some downstate counties such as Fulton, most of the 2016 third-party vote went for Trump rather than Biden, and college students being at home hurt the Dems' raw vote totals in college counties like Champaign and Jackson.
Logged
CentristRepublican
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2021, 06:21:57 PM »

2016 was a combination of the suburbs reacting poorly to Trump and the bottom falling out downstate slightly less than would have been expected, probably helped by the relatively unpopular Mark Kirk's underperformance there in the concurrent Senate race. The trends in 2020 were typical of the nation at large, with the downstate R trend strong enough to blunt Chicagoland somewhat and a much more nationalized Senate race against the heavily entrenched Durbin. In some downstate counties such as Fulton, most of the 2016 third-party vote went for Trump rather than Biden, and college students being at home hurt the Dems' raw vote totals in college counties like Champaign and Jackson.

Although that may make sense in theory, in practice it's not true in this case.

 Champaign County saw more raw votes cast in 2020, and Biden's margin expand by 4.5%. In fact, Biden outperformed Barack Obama's performance in both 2008 and 2012. Biden's 60% in the county is the most ever for any Democrat. In no way whatsoever did it trend rightward in 2020.

Jackson County, though, makes more sense, since it had pretty much the same raw votes in 2020, and Trump's margin of loss went down from 3.2% to 1.3%.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 9 queries.