Scarlett Johansson sues Disney
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:31:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: World politics is up Schmitt creek)
  Scarlett Johansson sues Disney
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Scarlett Johansson sues Disney  (Read 337 times)
John Dule
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,406
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.57, S: -7.50

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 02, 2021, 02:54:36 PM »

Kind of a tabloid story, but this might set an interesting precedent. Essentially, Johansson's pay for Black Widow was based on a percentage of box office receipts, but Disney also released the movie on their streaming service, which diminished ticket sales. Apparently Emma Stone is also considering suing Disney, as they did the same thing with the movie Cruella.

I couldn't care less about what these people get paid for starring in horrible cinematic trash, but it's always good to see Disney get held accountable. It'll be interesting to see how the courts handle this new era of film distribution.
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2021, 07:03:35 PM »

The precedent should be that streaming sales also count as part of the box office.
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,667
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2021, 10:01:48 PM »

Kind of a tabloid story, but this might set an interesting precedent. Essentially, Johansson's pay for Black Widow was based on a percentage of box office receipts, but Disney also released the movie on their streaming service, which diminished ticket sales. Apparently Emma Stone is also considering suing Disney, as they did the same thing with the movie Cruella.

Not just that, but because Disney+ was already in development by the time when her contract was being negotiated, her agent saw to it that her contract explicitly stipulated that the movie would see an exclusive theatrical release. It's like Chapek's lawyers didn't even bother to pay attention to Contracts back when they were in 1L. In any event, the Mouse's extremely tone-deaf response isn't likely to do them any favors in court either (presuming, of course, that it even gets that far & that the PR team didn't just immediately get in touch with legal & tell them to shut the f**k up & settle this ASAP).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 11 queries.