SB 104-14: Senate Special Elections Amendment (Rejected) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:37:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 104-14: Senate Special Elections Amendment (Rejected) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 104-14: Senate Special Elections Amendment (Rejected)  (Read 1975 times)
GM Team Member and Senator WB
weatherboy1102
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,834
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: -7.83

P
WWW
« on: July 26, 2021, 08:12:55 PM »
Quote from: AGA on July 26, 2021, 08:06:56 PM
I find it odd that party chairs make appointments. Why not have the president make appointments with a same-party rule?
That could easily result in someone party-switching to give one side an advantage. For example if I resigned and let's say Razze suddenly switched to DA then was appointed and switched back, then Labor-aligned senators would have 1 more than before.
Logged
GM Team Member and Senator WB
weatherboy1102
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,834
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: -7.83

P
WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2021, 05:38:22 PM »
Nay
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.