Who Do you Think Is The Most Overrated General of All Time? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 02:09:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Who Do you Think Is The Most Overrated General of All Time? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who Do you Think Is The Most Overrated General of All Time?  (Read 1076 times)
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,354


« on: July 23, 2021, 12:37:48 AM »

The issue with Lee is that he was pretty damn good at tactical victories and short term strategy for a campaign or so but if you look at multiple battles his casualty percentage was always higher than the Union's. This is just awful from most strategical perspectives.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Days_Battles
110k vs 92k
15k vs 20k casualties
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Antietam
85k vs 38k
12k vs 12k casualties
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Fredericksburg
122k vs 80k
12k vs 5k casualties. Finally a better ratio for Lee.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Chancellorsville
130k vs 60k
17k vs 12k casualties
Gettysburg was just flat out awful.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Wilderness
100k vs 60k
17k vs 11k or about equal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cold_Harbor
110k vs 60k
12k vs 5k.

Probably one of the worst errors by Grant though who truly was a general at least ahead of his time and able to learn from this.

Overall Lee was a good general and did the best with his resources but he wasn't a god tier general.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,354


« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2021, 10:12:34 AM »

Gettysburg was just flat out awful.

I actually wasn't familiar with the Gettysburg casualty numbers so I looked it up. Sustaining more losses than the Union while outnumbered by about 3:2 is terrible, yes, although it looks like the Seen Days Battles were about as bad only with somewhat fewer losses on both sides.

I mean yes its true that Lee did win the 7 day battles with a pretty hard task but in the long run it was just bad for the Confederacy.  Even when Lee went on the offensive his goals were to capture/raid some northern cities. The clear goal of the Civil war was to capture an army which Lee failed to do in any meaningful amount.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Chickamauga
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chattanooga_campaign

In this case Bragg suffered more casualties in his "victory" and then tried to besiege a city but the Union managed to send reinforcements.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.