Which shift was more painful to see? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:49:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Which shift was more painful to see? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which shift was more painful to see?
#1
Miami-Dade
 
#2
Rio Grande Valley
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 68

Author Topic: Which shift was more painful to see?  (Read 1963 times)
South Dakota Democrat
jrk26
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,398


« on: July 22, 2021, 09:50:56 PM »

Easily the RGV

This isn't the first time Republicans have done so well in Miami-Dade. Bush did better in 2004. Besides it was clear for a while that long term Florida is lost, too many retirees are moving in

But Texas hurts. At some point, Democrats won't be able to win in WI/MI/PA. I suspect that 2020 might be a last hurrah for the Midwest. Mayve a few more elections. Texas is badly needed to balance them out. I did not think Biden would win Texas, but I did hope and expect that it would be close, thus laying the blueprint for Democrats to win in 2024. Like how Hillary's close margins in Arizonia laid the groundwork for wins in 2018 and 2020



Bush also did better in the RGV in 2004 (and lost MI/WI/PA by about the same or less) but OK, let’s jump to hyperbolic conclusions about how these places are all gone for good rather than just having reverted to the pre-Obama norm.

Also Biden lost TX by about as much as Hillary lost GA and AZ.

No.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 16 queries.