Which shift was more painful to see? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 08:47:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Which shift was more painful to see? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which shift was more painful to see?
#1
Miami-Dade
 
#2
Rio Grande Valley
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 68

Author Topic: Which shift was more painful to see?  (Read 1939 times)
bagelman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,624
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.17

P P P
« on: July 18, 2021, 01:34:25 AM »

Texas still swung and trended Democratic in spite of the massive shifts in the RGV.

Let's be honest. From a numerical standpoint, losing Zapata but flipping Tarrant, Williamson and Hays is a really good trade for Democrats. The more serious problem for them is that the overall margin in Harris didn't really budge.

With that in mind, it was numerically worse that Miami-Dade shifted.

However I still say it's worse that the RGV shifted. These are small city and ruralish people and they just keep shifting away from Democrats. Trump won new voters. It's far more painful to see new voters, many who never voted before at all, come up to the ballot and vote Trump AFTER his terrible tenure in office. Democrats cannot win outside cities it seems. As for Cubans, they were just coming home because of something something Venezuela.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 15 queries.