Why Did Hillary Clinton perform so strongly in the MI primary, just to lose them 8 years later? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 12:48:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why Did Hillary Clinton perform so strongly in the MI primary, just to lose them 8 years later? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why Did Hillary Clinton perform so strongly in the MI primary, just to lose them 8 years later?  (Read 1384 times)
TheTide
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,658
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

P P P
« on: May 27, 2023, 01:08:01 PM »
Quote from: TDAS04 on July 03, 2021, 04:25:59 PM
The 2008 Michigan Primary wasn't really supposed to relevant.  Michigan was supposed to be stripped of delegates, and Obama wasn't on the ballot, so Clinton beat "uncommitted."

Quote from: TDAS04 on May 26, 2023, 09:14:21 PM
Guys, if Michigan actually had a legitimate, respected primary in 2008, Obama might have won it.

I think you are safe in posting the next set of winning lottery numbers or the meaning of life in this thread. Evidently such a significant fact would be ignored.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.