Why Did Hillary Clinton perform so strongly in the MI primary, just to lose them 8 years later? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 06:38:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why Did Hillary Clinton perform so strongly in the MI primary, just to lose them 8 years later? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why Did Hillary Clinton perform so strongly in the MI primary, just to lose them 8 years later?  (Read 1397 times)
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,527
Bhutan


« on: July 03, 2021, 04:25:59 PM »
The 2008 Michigan Primary wasn't really supposed to relevant.  Michigan was supposed to be stripped of delegates, and Obama wasn't on the ballot, so Clinton beat "uncommitted."
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,527
Bhutan


« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2023, 09:14:21 PM »
Guys, if Michigan actually had a legitimate, respected primary in 2008, Obama might have won it.

A better question would be why John McCain went from winning the Michigan primary in 2000 to losing it 8 years later. (Of course, it’s Mitt Romney’s native state. Still a better question nonetheless).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 14 queries.