How would you rate Tom Emmer's performance as NRCC Chair?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 23, 2021, 12:13:06 PM
News: EV Calculator updated with new apportionment numbers, custom labels, orange party color and more. Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, Gass3268, VirginiŠ)
  How would you rate Tom Emmer's performance as NRCC Chair?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Your rating?
#1
A+
 
#2
A
 
#3
A-
 
#4
B+
 
#5
B
 
#6
B-
 
#7
C+
 
#8
C
 
#9
C-
 
#10
D+
 
#11
D
 
#12
D-
 
#13
F
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 19

Author Topic: How would you rate Tom Emmer's performance as NRCC Chair?  (Read 227 times)
SirWoodbury
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,016


Political Matrix
E: 1.48, S: 1.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 11, 2021, 05:03:48 AM »

?
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,949
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2021, 08:32:02 AM »

A- because the GOP did well... although I honestly do not think it has much to do with him.
Logged
MR. KAYNE WEST
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,696
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2021, 08:45:59 AM »

C the Rs aren't gonna win the Senate for sure but Redistricting may allow them to win the House narrowly because we are gonna keep the 303 blue wall with our Govs and Senate races

But,we have to wait and see if a blue wave eventually develops Manchin is stopping Ds frim wage insurence seats in DC Statehood and and by not passing HR 1 and 4 by keeping the Filibuster
Logged
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,695
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2021, 09:54:26 AM »

C. Would be higher if they got better pollsters
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,253
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2021, 10:02:33 AM »

Iím pretty sure they gave up on several R-trending Trump districts because they had "strong D incumbents" while prioritizing districts with far less favorable trends/demographics, so yeah, maybe marginally more competent than the NRSC (lowest bar possible), but no better than a D.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,912
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.26, S: -4.96

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2021, 10:19:15 AM »

C-. He got lucky more than anything, since his decision to prioritize districts like FL-26 and TX-23 over PA-08 and WI-03 would've looked hilariously bad if not for Trump improving among minorities.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,439
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2021, 11:58:01 AM »

I'll give him a B. While the GOP did have a good night, I feel that Emmer himself had less to do with it than the candidates he ran, and Elise Stefanik for her recruitment efforts of woman candidates.

But in hindsight there clearly was a missed opportunity to take back the house. They focused too much on defending solidly R seats like NC-08, NC-11, MT-AL, NY-02, TX-10, TX-21, CA-50, C0-03, and AR-02, while writing off seats that they could have easily flipped back, like ME-02, IL-14, MN-02, NY-19, CA-10, VA-07, WI-03, and PA-08.

Still, they held onto all but one of their non-NC seats, and swept all of the top tier offensive targets (MN-07, NM-02, OK-05, SC-01, NY-11, NY-22, IA-01, UT-04, CA-21) and did quite well in the second tier (IA-02, CA-39, CA-48, FL-26, FL-27). Yeah I think I see why Emmer got a second term.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.