Hypothetical Senate primary: Kyrsten Sinema vs. Ruben Gallego?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:54:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Hypothetical Senate primary: Kyrsten Sinema vs. Ruben Gallego?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Who would win a Senate primary between Kyrsten Sinema and Ruben Gallego?
#1
Kyrsten Sinema
 
#2
Ruben Gallego
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 72

Author Topic: Hypothetical Senate primary: Kyrsten Sinema vs. Ruben Gallego?  (Read 1885 times)
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,838
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 09, 2021, 04:46:16 PM »

Quite similar to the Arkansas democratic primary in 2010
Logged
Schiff for Senate
CentristRepublican
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,232
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 09, 2021, 05:01:53 PM »

Simena would win.

In any event, Progressives would be better off trying to primary Feinstein, Menenedez and Carper instead.

Very true.

   In states like AZ, WV and MT, a primary challenge from the left is unhelpful because a.) it won't work and b.) if it somehow does, all it does is flip the seat Republican. Arizona is purple; it's possible a Democrat more liberal than Sinema may lose, and Montana and West Virginia are red seats (though Montana is bluer than people give it credit for; it voted for McCain by just 2% in 2008). A Democrat other than Jon Tester probably can't win over enough Montana Republicans - Steve Bullock's 2020 campaign proved that. And I guarantee that no Democrat other than Manchin can win in WV, which is why Jim Justice switched parties. Even Manchin, a very popular former governor, won by just 3% in 2018 thanks to Trump's interference after winning in a landslide in 2012.

  But California is solidly blue, and Feinstein is too old and out-of-touch. It's best she retires in 2024, or she may lose to another Democrat. Progressives should focus there. Menendez is corrupt and can easily be primaried - a challenger might even win if they have a solid background, like a representative (someone like Donald Norcross, Andy Kim, Josh Gottheimer, etc.). Carper also has the 'Feinstein problem': old and out-of-touch. Another possible race where progressives could try to primary is Mark Warner's senate seat.

So yeah, the problem with progressives like Paula Jean Swearingin is they're focusing on unwinnable races that will lead to a 'lose-lose': a centrist to moderate liberal deposed and replaced by a conservative Republican, and the progressive element being blamed for the loss and discredited. (Paula Jean Swearingin, who primaried Manchin in 2018, ran in 2020 and won the nomination, facing Republican incumbent Shelley Moore-Capito, and lost every single county in the state. If she had won the nomination in 2018, she would have cost Democrats the seat there, too.)
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 10, 2021, 02:23:35 PM »

Quite similar to the Arkansas democratic primary in 2010
Personally, it reminds me of the 2004 election to the Vorarlberg Landtag
Logged
The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow
slightlyburnttoast
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,050
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.43

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 10, 2021, 02:29:01 PM »

Quite similar to the Arkansas democratic primary in 2010

This was my first thought as well. I certainly think it would be competitive, but I would give Simena an edge for now simply by virtue of incumbency. Democrats have also generally demonstrated a lot of deference to the notion of "electability," or at least what they perceive to be "electability," in recent years, so I could imagine a lot of them sticking with Sinema because they think that she would be a significantly stronger candidate than Gallego in a general election.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,817
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 10, 2021, 03:01:32 PM »

Sinema would probably win, though I'd support Gallego here.
Logged
Secretary of State Liberal Hack
IBNU
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,903
Singapore


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: June 13, 2021, 10:21:38 PM »

Sinema would win with around 60% of the vote. Gallego wouldn't be a bad candidate, but I'll believe a Democratic Senator getting primaried for being too friendly with Republicans when I see it.
Joe Liberman ?
Logged
Astatine
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,882


Political Matrix
E: -0.72, S: -5.90

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: June 15, 2021, 04:58:26 PM »

Quite similar to the Arkansas democratic primary in 2010
Personally, it reminds me of the 2004 election to the Vorarlberg Landtag
Tender is it you
Logged
SnowLabrador
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,577
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: June 15, 2021, 08:18:29 PM »

Sinema would probably win, though I'd support Gallego here.
Logged
YE
Modadmin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,724


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: June 17, 2021, 08:03:51 AM »

Gallego given how disloyal Sinema has been to the president.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,645
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: June 17, 2021, 09:04:10 AM »

Quite similar to the Arkansas democratic primary in 2010
Personally, it reminds me of the 2004 election to the Vorarlberg Landtag
Tender is it you

Nah, the question is: Is Donerail in Tender's basement?
Logged
Dipper Josh
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 377


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: June 17, 2021, 02:16:54 PM »

Yes. If Kelly wins in 2022, it's a no brainer for Gallego to run. Everyone gets what they want. Gallego is the perfect compromise candidate and the party really should have backed right off the bat like they were rumoured to be doing.

He's played along with the party brass in congress for multiple terms, he didn't get caught up in any of the primary drama thanks to him endorsing Swalwell, he won't rock the boat, and the Progs will be happy because he iced Sinema.

I think if the party backs off and leaves Sinema to her own devices while some popular national figures back Gallego, he'd pull it off.

Simena would win.

In any event, Progressives would be better off trying to primary Feinstein, Menenedez and Carper instead.

They'll probably do all 4, as they should. Progressives organizations are better funded and organized now, They'll have better luck finding good candidates in these states. IIRC and emphasis on IIRC, Justice Dems didnt challenge Menendez because they straight up couldnt find someone to do it.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.