McLaughlin & Associates national poll: Trump 49% Harris 45%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 11:06:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2024 U.S. Presidential Election
  2024 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, GeorgiaModerate, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  McLaughlin & Associates national poll: Trump 49% Harris 45%
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: McLaughlin & Associates national poll: Trump 49% Harris 45%  (Read 3137 times)
UncleSam
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,509


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 02, 2021, 11:04:11 AM »

Not people actually taking a McLaughlin poll seriously. Roll Eyes

Like, this is literally one of the questions they surveyed in this poll: "Do you approve or disapprove of the new laws in places such as California and Vermont that allow non-citizens to vote in U.S. elections?"

No such laws exist.  
Uh, they do. In CA they issue driver’s licenses to non-citizens, then turn around and all you need to vote is...a driver’s license. They pretty clearly are trying to signal to non-citizens that they want to look the other way there, just like they want to look the other way when people immigrate here illegally.

This falls entirely under the category of ‘laws that allow non-citizens to vote’.

Not saying the poll isn’t a push poll and biased heavily towards Trump, though, because it clearly is. Harris seems to be underperforming among minority voters, which is interesting. I wish we had the cross tabs on that - Trump seems to have a weird appeal to black / Hispanic men so it’d be interesting to see if, in his best-case scenario, his gains were being made specifically among those groups or not.

Either way, as I’ve said for a while, Harris wouldn’t make a great candidate and if Biden steps down to hand her the presidency that’d be an even worse look.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,166


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 02, 2021, 06:26:43 PM »

If it's Trump vs. Harris, time to panic. Harris cannot run a national campaign.

Seemed to work fine in November 2020.
Logged
Holy Unifying Centrist
DTC
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208


Political Matrix
E: 9.53, S: 10.54

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 02, 2021, 06:50:08 PM »

If it's Trump vs. Harris, time to panic. Harris cannot run a national campaign.

Seemed to work fine in November 2020.

Biden was the nominee...
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,166


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 02, 2021, 06:55:05 PM »

If it's Trump vs. Harris, time to panic. Harris cannot run a national campaign.

Seemed to work fine in November 2020.

Biden was the nominee...

Harris was the #2 on a major national campaign. The notion that she can't run a national campaign just because of her 2019 primary performance is getting ridiculous. None of that matters given she was on the stump for months as a VP candidate and now as the VP, and has done perfectly fine - and did perfectly fine when she was on the trail for months in 2020.
Logged
Chips
Those Chips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,245
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 05, 2021, 09:59:59 PM »

Don't underestimate either of these candidates. Period!
Logged
Statilius the Epicurean
Thersites
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,607
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: June 05, 2021, 10:02:08 PM »

If you unskew it to take account of missing low trust WWCs it's more like 52-43 #TRUMPSLIDE
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.