What is everyone's opinion on parallel voting? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 03:02:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
  What is everyone's opinion on parallel voting? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Parallel voting?
#1
Freedom system
 
#2
Horrible system
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 11

Author Topic: What is everyone's opinion on parallel voting?  (Read 1669 times)
Damocles
Sword of Damocles
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,772
United States


« on: June 14, 2021, 07:38:22 PM »

The trouble with mixed-member majoritarian systems is that they’re a clunky compromise between party list proportional systems, and single-member district systems. They attempt to both introduce better proportionality into existing single-member district systems, or to force a consensus to emerge in fragmented proportional systems, but end up sucking at both.

In the first case, parties which win a significant fraction of the vote still win a much smaller percentage of seats, which suppresses parties that enjoy broad popular support. In the second case, it compromises the legitimacy of an otherwise proportional result, which can introduce the appearance of impropriety into the election.

Furthermore, having two separate electoral mechanisms for different parts of the same legislative body is a rather clunky and inefficient system. I am also critical of the implementation of Germany’s MMP system, for this exact reason. It can create confusion and resentment towards the system from any number of corners.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.