Rasmussen: Lieberman(I) still has two point lead on Lamont(D)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 10:58:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  Rasmussen: Lieberman(I) still has two point lead on Lamont(D)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rasmussen: Lieberman(I) still has two point lead on Lamont(D)  (Read 1116 times)
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,811
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 22, 2006, 10:41:49 AM »
« edited: August 25, 2006, 08:08:21 PM by overton »

New Poll: Connecticut Senator by Rasmussen on 2006-08-21

Summary: D: 43%, R: 6%, U: 2%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Flying Dog
Jtfdem
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,404
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2006, 10:51:27 AM »

Its tightening up.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2006, 12:02:33 PM »

Excellent. Lamont continues to gain and will only continue to rise in the polls.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,811
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2006, 12:09:21 PM »

I think that he has to lead in the polls just like Ford has to gain the lead before this race can go to Lamont. I still that the advantage still goes to Lieberman.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2006, 12:17:23 PM »

This is still very good for Lamont - he's challenging a 3 term incumbent.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,610
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2006, 12:22:58 PM »

Interesting to see how consistent the Lamont numbers are, across all pollsters (43, 42, 41; essentially no difference there), while the Lieberman figure is much higher in Quinnipiac (53) than Rasmussen (45) or ARG (44).
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2006, 09:16:13 PM »

Interesting to see how consistent the Lamont numbers are, across all pollsters (43, 42, 41; essentially no difference there), while the Lieberman figure is much higher in Quinnipiac (53) than Rasmussen (45) or ARG (44).

Yeah thats pretty odd. Lets hope a fourth firm polls it soon.
Logged
jerusalemcar5
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,731
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 23, 2006, 12:41:37 AM »

I figured Quinnipiac was an outlier.  It only makes sense Lieberman would continue to fall.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2006, 01:09:04 AM »

I figured Quinnipiac was an outlier.  It only makes sense Lieberman would continue to fall.

You gotta help out Alan man. Poor guy is dying out there.
Logged
jerusalemcar5
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,731
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2006, 02:09:42 AM »

I figured Quinnipiac was an outlier.  It only makes sense Lieberman would continue to fall.

You gotta help out Alan man. Poor guy is dying out there.

Hey.  I knew that silly "4%" is wrong.  He is pulling 6%!  How much farther until 51??? Not much!  Schlesy for President baby!  It is right around the corner!
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,554
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2006, 08:03:20 AM »

It doesn't matter if it closes up, Lamont won't win it.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,811
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2006, 08:29:08 AM »

It appears that Lamont was weaker than expected.
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2006, 12:49:29 PM »

Can anyone get the internals for this? I click on the link and get one of those "cannot be found" bits. Tongue
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2006, 10:12:42 PM »
« Edited: August 24, 2006, 03:14:30 PM by Eraserhead »

It doesn't matter if it closes up, Lamont won't win it.

Yes we know the polls mean nothing unless they show whoever you are supporting winning decisevely.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,770


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2006, 05:09:48 AM »

Considering that polling indicate Lamont's negatives are already about as high as Lieberman's I think he will have a hard time. More name recognition won't automatically help him.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.227 seconds with 15 queries.