ARG: Lieberman (ID) and Lamont (D) Statistically Tied in CT
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 10:33:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  ARG: Lieberman (ID) and Lamont (D) Statistically Tied in CT
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ARG: Lieberman (ID) and Lamont (D) Statistically Tied in CT  (Read 1211 times)
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 22, 2006, 10:09:34 AM »

New Poll: Connecticut Senator by ARG on 2006-08-21

Summary: D: 42%, R: 3%, U: 11%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2006, 11:58:18 AM »

Assuming this poll is correct, which I doubt, theres still the problem of the undecided numbers. Leiberman has 57% approve 43% disapprove, Lamont sits at 4% approve 41% disapprove 55% unsure. Lamont has to get his name out, quck!
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2006, 09:13:07 PM »

I was ready to dismiss this poll as well until I saw the Rasmussen poll with similar results (of course this poll has way more undecideds). Good news, lets just hope Ned can ride the momentum through October.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2006, 09:15:12 PM »

As the war and the Republicans become less and less popular, Lieberman's support will only continue to go down.

I am still in shock at how low Schlessinger's numbers are. Imagine how much Lieberman would be losing by if Republicans were actually voting for the Republican??
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2006, 09:20:29 PM »

As the war and the Republicans become less and less popular, Lieberman's support will only continue to go down.

I am still in shock at how low Schlessinger's numbers are. Imagine how much Lieberman would be losing by if Republicans were actually voting for the Republican??

Yes, thats a good point and thats why the Republicans won't put a real candidate in the race becuse Lamont would win with ease.

Christ just when you thought it couldn't get any worse for Alan. 3%. His share of the vote/impact on the race is basically non-existent at this point and yet Lamont is still in the running. Thats a good sign.
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2006, 12:54:24 PM »

This race will be won amongst the Independents. I mean, they're 43% of Likely Voters. And at this point...71% of them Approve of Lieberman. Wink

Also note that 14% of Reps are undecided...who do you think they will vote for, in the end? That will also be important...

I think I'm going to follow the Indys a lot in this race... Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.