Rothenberg political report and Senate ratings
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:39:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Rothenberg political report and Senate ratings
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Rothenberg political report and Senate ratings  (Read 2201 times)
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: August 22, 2006, 09:01:22 AM »

But the name of the game is that he has AZ, TN, and VA all republican favored, and has not one either in leaning or tossup. That says something.

It says hes a hack! Ok, maybe thats a bit harsh.

Lol! It says that you two are hacks.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: August 22, 2006, 09:13:46 AM »

Looking at the ratings they are over-all very reasonable. The only exception is Lieberman, but I get the sense that he is looking at party control rather than individual senators, and the GOP obviously has no chance of getting the seat.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,671
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: August 22, 2006, 09:56:14 AM »

I am not a hack, I just pointed out that VA is not in the Democratic bag, like alot people think right now. VA is a very conservative state.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: August 22, 2006, 10:45:47 AM »

Looking at the ratings they are over-all very reasonable.

I agree, though I looked at his governor ratings and I can't figure out why he lists Schwartzenegger as safe.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: August 22, 2006, 04:24:51 PM »

I am not a hack, I just pointed out that VA is not in the Democratic bag, like alot people think right now. VA is a very conservative state.

Where are you getting the impression that alot of people think its in the Democratic bag??  I think alot may think this race is becoming competitive, but the vast majority still feel Allen is favored.  And while VA is somewhat conservative, it is not very conservative and not nearly as conservative as it use to be.  It is still a conservative & GOP leaning state, but the very sharp left turn in NOVA  has moved the state from a heavy GOP & conservative state into a conservative & GOP leaning state.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,492
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: August 22, 2006, 09:41:58 PM »

Looking at the ratings they are over-all very reasonable. The only exception is Lieberman, but I get the sense that he is looking at party control rather than individual senators, and the GOP obviously has no chance of getting the seat.

It is you who is the hack....you...you hack!
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,492
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: August 22, 2006, 09:42:40 PM »

NJ a tossup my ass.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,671
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: August 22, 2006, 11:18:34 PM »

Where are you getting hack from?
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,492
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: August 23, 2006, 01:11:48 AM »


Prior page's discussion.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,671
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: August 23, 2006, 01:57:58 AM »

I don't think anyone is a hack. Do you mean one of us are hacks or Rothenberg is a hack. A hack is someone who is unreasonable when making judgements. I don't think no one's arguement is unreasonable unless you point out specifically, and we could respond if you are refering to one of us, or are talking about Rothenberg?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.