Biden administration cites the 1619 project as inspirational in history grant proposal (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 01:13:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Biden administration cites the 1619 project as inspirational in history grant proposal (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Biden administration cites the 1619 project as inspirational in history grant proposal  (Read 1876 times)
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


« on: April 19, 2021, 04:29:08 PM »

You're still raging about this? Get some new material...

Yes cause it’s a disgrace

Care to explain, you know, why exactly?

Extra points for actually constructing an argument Beyond simply linking some article from a conservative publication.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2021, 04:50:39 PM »

I don't care for the 1619 Project either, but calling it "Un-American Propaganda" is simply untrue. It is, at the very least, an actual analysis of American history, unlike say, the 1776 commission, which actually is Propaganda.

To say it is an actual analysis is to declare that it has some basis in fact, which it clearly does not.

Any talk of "1776" aside (which obviously was formed in reaction to the "1619 Project"), Miss Hannah-Jones is clearly trying to push an agenda, and while it's maybe not one I would call "unpatriotic," it is very obviously one that is anti-white, which is worse.

Wow. Not even trying to hide your true colors anymore, are you?
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2021, 05:01:26 PM »

I don't care for the 1619 Project either, but calling it "Un-American Propaganda" is simply untrue. It is, at the very least, an actual analysis of American history, unlike say, the 1776 commission, which actually is Propaganda.

To say it is an actual analysis is to declare that it has some basis in fact, which it clearly does not.

Any talk of "1776" aside (which obviously was formed in reaction to the "1619 Project"), Miss Hannah-Jones is clearly trying to push an agenda, and while it's maybe not one I would call "unpatriotic," it is very obviously one that is anti-white, which is worse.

Wow. Not even trying to hide your true colors anymore, are you?

Do red avs have any attempt at a witty response any more other than "wow, going full mask off" / "showing your true colors" anymore? I guess not. Pretty sad honestly. I defer to Dule's sig.

I would be very careful about passing stones in Your Glass House of attempted witty comebacks that ignore the underlying question. That is precisely what you just did, not even attempting to defend crossing the line for whatever scholarly shortcomings the 1619 project may or may not have to just openly admitting a trigger you and your white identity. And furthermore that somewhere in your book being anti white is worse than being unpatriotic.

We get it dude. You will simper that you've been unfairly maligned as a racist because you dared attack the 1619 project, when in fact you response demonstrates you are waving your white identity flag proudly. In short, you are a racist and you suck. That's you get only the level of response you deserve. See my Sig for details.

Good day, sir!
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2021, 05:17:38 PM »

I don't care for the 1619 Project either, but calling it "Un-American Propaganda" is simply untrue. It is, at the very least, an actual analysis of American history, unlike say, the 1776 commission, which actually is Propaganda.

To say it is an actual analysis is to declare that it has some basis in fact, which it clearly does not.

Any talk of "1776" aside (which obviously was formed in reaction to the "1619 Project"), Miss Hannah-Jones is clearly trying to push an agenda, and while it's maybe not one I would call "unpatriotic," it is very obviously one that is anti-white, which is worse.

Wow. Not even trying to hide your true colors anymore, are you?

Do red avs have any attempt at a witty response any more other than "wow, going full mask off" / "showing your true colors" anymore? I guess not. Pretty sad honestly. I defer to Dule's sig.
It’s less witty and more of a polite way of Badger saying you come off as a reactionary bigot

If opposing Afrocentrism is what passes for "reactionary bigotry" these days, then such an accusation has lost all meaning.

I don't care for the 1619 Project either, but calling it "Un-American Propaganda" is simply untrue. It is, at the very least, an actual analysis of American history, unlike say, the 1776 commission, which actually is Propaganda.

To say it is an actual analysis is to declare that it has some basis in fact, which it clearly does not.

Any talk of "1776" aside (which obviously was formed in reaction to the "1619 Project"), Miss Hannah-Jones is clearly trying to push an agenda, and while it's maybe not one I would call "unpatriotic," it is very obviously one that is anti-white, which is worse.

Wow. Not even trying to hide your true colors anymore, are you?

Do red avs have any attempt at a witty response any more other than "wow, going full mask off" / "showing your true colors" anymore? I guess not. Pretty sad honestly. I defer to Dule's sig.

I would be very careful about passing stones in Your Glass House of attempted witty comebacks that ignore the underlying question. That is precisely what you just did, not even attempting to defend crossing the line for whatever scholarly shortcomings the 1619 project may or may not have to just openly admitting a trigger you and your white identity. And furthermore that somewhere in your book being anti white is worse than being unpatriotic.

We get it dude. You will simper that you've been unfairly maligned as a racist because you dared attack the 1619 project, when in fact you response demonstrates you are waving your white identity flag proudly. In short, you are a racist and you suck. That's you get only the level of response you deserve. See my Sig for details.

Good day, sir!

No need to really attempt to defend something when you didn't provide a coherent refutation.

Although I do fin.....

I said GOOD DAY, Sir!
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2021, 11:06:02 AM »

The fundamental issue with the 1619 Project isn't that it's "anti-American". Jesus. It's the fact that its methodology is sloppy, its primary sources are few and cherrypicked, and that its conclusions require too many assumptions to hold water.

I don't believe for a second that OSR has actually read it.

Correct on both points.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2021, 12:49:12 PM »



Yeah you're not a right-winger, you're just anti-transgender, anti-immigration, and anti-BLM and defend the Capitol Terrorists... nothing right-wing about that, right?

I still don’t understand why people on the left are so supportive of immigration.

It's an American thing. You wouldn't get it.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2021, 01:50:04 AM »


Yeah you're not a right-winger, you're just anti-transgender, anti-immigration, and anti-BLM and defend the Capitol Terrorists... nothing right-wing about that, right?

I still don’t understand why people on the left are so supportive of immigration.

It's an American thing. You wouldn't get it.

Well it is here too, to a lesser extent. I wonder how much it is Pavlovian opposition to Trump.

Next to none. Honestly not sure where you conjured that misapprehension.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.