Should there be a wealth tax of 100% for net worth over $1 billion? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 04:48:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should there be a wealth tax of 100% for net worth over $1 billion? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should there be a wealth tax of 100% for net worth over $1 billion?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 73

Author Topic: Should there be a wealth tax of 100% for net worth over $1 billion?  (Read 1664 times)
Velasco
andi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,707
Western Sahara


WWW
« on: May 11, 2021, 11:50:37 PM »
« edited: May 11, 2021, 11:54:49 PM by Velasco »

Some say there shouldn't be any billionaires. This seems like it would ensure that. Would this be better than the status quo?

It seems to me a 100% wealth tax is a bit dumb, when there exists a more obvious alternative known as expropriation. In case your intention is not to expropriate or confiscate, but rather ensure there are no billionaires, you should implement a special wealth tax designed for that purpose with a rate below 100%. I guess the rate should be variable, depending on the wealth of every billionaire
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.