2021 Boston Mayoral Election Megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 05:10:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2021 Boston Mayoral Election Megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who will win?
#1
Michelle Wu
 
#2
Kim Janey
 
#3
Andrea Campbell
 
#4
Jon Santiago
 
#5
John Barros
 
#6
Annissa Essaibi George
 
#7
Michael J. Bianchi II
 
#8
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 58

Author Topic: 2021 Boston Mayoral Election Megathread  (Read 3570 times)
ملكة كرينجيتوك
khuzifenq
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,328
United States


P P
WWW
« on: October 22, 2021, 07:01:00 PM »

I haven’t seen much discussion about this election, but could someone give a quick tl;dr on what’s deal with it? Big issues? (I assume housing because superstar city gonna superstar city, but what’s the discourse about it in Boston? Doesn’t feel like it gets as much attention as other cities.) What are the candidates’ coalitions? Are either of them future prospects for MA-GOV/SEN or are they running to be mayor for life? Is being mayor even that great or is it like NYC when the gov just bullies you all day? Very curious about one.

Doesn't seem to be much discussion of the race on AAD either, outside of a handful of Tweets. Wu has been endorsed by both the current mayor and Ayanna Pressley.


Wu does relatively better with Asian voters and Latino voters- her coalition seems more concerned with housing and public transit. By contrast, AEG seems to have the advantage on crime/law-and-order. This checks out with that 538 podcast on the race I listened to last month.
Logged
ملكة كرينجيتوك
khuzifenq
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,328
United States


P P
WWW
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2021, 10:39:44 PM »

I haven’t seen much discussion about this election, but could someone give a quick tl;dr on what’s deal with it? Big issues? (I assume housing because superstar city gonna superstar city, but what’s the discourse about it in Boston? Doesn’t feel like it gets as much attention as other cities.) What are the candidates’ coalitions? Are either of them future prospects for MA-GOV/SEN or are they running to be mayor for life? Is being mayor even that great or is it like NYC when the gov just bullies you all day? Very curious about one.

Doesn't seem to be much discussion of the race on AAD either, outside of a handful of Tweets. Wu has been endorsed by both the current mayor and Ayanna Pressley.


Wu does relatively better with Asian voters and Latino voters- her coalition seems more concerned with housing and public transit. By contrast, AEG seems to have the advantage on crime/law-and-order. This checks out with that 538 podcast on the race I listened to last month.

Interesting - seems like crime would be a less salient issue in Boston than maybe in other cities, so it'd make sense that a law-and-order campaign might be less effective there. Would be interesting to see Asians/Latinos go for the progressive-coded candidate in the race, but then again, I don't know much about the demographic profiles of either group in Boston.

Here's what I can glean from Statistical Atlas:

The Asians in Boston proper are mostly ethnic Chinese (49%/4.6%), with smaller numbers of Vietnamese (19%/1.8%) and Indians (14%/1.3%). Interestingly, the Cambodian proportion of the Asian population is much lower in Boston proper than Metro Boston as a whole. The Latinos are mostly Puerto Rican (28%/5.3%), Dominican (26%/4.9%), and Central American (22%/4.2%).

The Chinese seem to be concentrated around Chinatown (which has a relatively high median household income) and in the western lobe of Boston proper next to Cambridge[?]. The Vietnamese are concentrated in the more lower-income area south of downtown, around I-93 (east of where the Puerto Ricans and Dominicans are concentrated). The Indians are concentrated in the western lobe, although also in areas that have relatively low median incomes. The Central Americans are concentrated in the area east of the harbor.
Logged
ملكة كرينجيتوك
khuzifenq
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,328
United States


P P
WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2021, 09:28:46 PM »



Now we wait for the exit polls and precinct results #PineapplesBelongOnPizza
Logged
ملكة كرينجيتوك
khuzifenq
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,328
United States


P P
WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2021, 10:48:33 PM »

How can Michelle Wu be considered a "woman of color"? I didn't know that East Asian people are officially deemed "yellow". At least it sounds as though it's what that CNN anchor man is trying to drill into our heads. 🤷🏼‍♂️

Non-White or Minority can be interpreted as offensive, so it's a neutral term to refer to all groups that are not White - which Wu does not identify as.

It's sounds to strange to refer to them as "non-white" / "colored" as East Asian people's skin color is also white.

In the US, "White" basically means Europeans, their descendants, and neighboring peoples who physically/culturally resemble Europeans. East Asians do not fit these criteria (and from my observation, generally tan to darker skin tones than Northwestern Europeans).

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.