1960: Pat Brown vs. Richard Nixon
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 10:26:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1960: Pat Brown vs. Richard Nixon
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1960: Pat Brown vs. Richard Nixon  (Read 252 times)
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,919
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 02, 2021, 01:34:52 PM »

Suppose the Democratic convention in 1960 is deadlocked and California governor Pat Brown is nominated for president as a compromise candidate. He choses Missouri senator Stuart Symington as his running mate. How would he do against Richard Nixon, whom he IRL defeated in the 1962 gubernatorial election? Nixon's running mate is still Henry Cabot Lodge.
Logged
dw93
DWL
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,881
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2021, 08:34:30 PM »

Nixon wins. Brown had just been elected Governor of CA and Nixon would have an easier time playing the experience card against him than he did against Kennedy, plus Symington isn't going to pull as much (if any) weight in the south as LBJ did for Kennedy.
Logged
dw93
DWL
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,881
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2021, 10:58:35 PM »


Vice President Richard Nixon (R-CA) / UN Ambassador Henry Lodge (R-MA)
Governor Pat Brown (D-CA) / Senator Stuart Symington (D-MO)!✓

Here's a rough guess. Brown was sort of a poor man's Humphrey, but he would be able to bring the New Deal Coalition out. Similar collapse in the South because of the relative liberalism of the ticket, but no more than Kennedy lost for his Catholicism.

I doubt Brown would win Texas without LBJ on the ticket and I doubt any deep southern state would go to a Democratic ticket that doesn't feature a southerner (MO was a border state), and Brown, IIRC, was also a Catholic.
Logged
Agonized-Statism
Anarcho-Statism
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,805


Political Matrix
E: -9.10, S: -5.83

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2021, 12:53:57 AM »

I doubt Brown would win Texas without LBJ on the ticket and I doubt any deep southern state would go to a Democratic ticket that doesn't feature a southerner (MO was a border state), and Brown, IIRC, was also a Catholic.

I made it at first with LBJ as the running mate and changed it at the very end when I noticed Symington as a running mate was a requirement, but if Brown was a Catholic, you can dump my map altogether. Nixon probably wins.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,717
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2021, 09:28:40 AM »

Doubtful this Dem ticket would have won the election. Brown narrowly wins CA, but not having Johnson on the ticket costs him TX. Nixon narrowly is elected prez.



✓ Vice President Richard Nixon (R-CA)/Former Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge (R-MA): 273 EVs.; 50.3%
Governor Edmund G. Brown (D-CA)/Senator Stuart Symington (D-MO): 224 EVs.; 256 EVs.; 48.6%
Unpledged Dixiecrat Electors: 8 EVs.; 0.2%
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.225 seconds with 14 queries.