UK By-elections thread, 2021-
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:21:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK By-elections thread, 2021-
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 ... 126
Author Topic: UK By-elections thread, 2021-  (Read 177709 times)
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1775 on: May 17, 2023, 01:09:26 PM »

The Bedfordshire seat would not be a fun one to campaign in- iirc it’s very large and doesn’t really have a centre.

The Tories recently won the mayoral race there but that mostly seemed to be thanks to it being FPTP.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,054
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1776 on: May 17, 2023, 01:29:11 PM »

Whats the calculus on who should challenge in Bedfordshire?

It seems to flip back and forth between Labour and the Lib Dems - presumably Starmer would leave it to Davey, and focus on the other two, especially given what an uphill fight it would be?
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 872
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1777 on: May 17, 2023, 01:50:38 PM »

Whats the calculus on who should challenge in Bedfordshire?

It seems to flip back and forth between Labour and the Lib Dems - presumably Starmer would leave it to Davey, and focus on the other two, especially given what an uphill fight it would be?
If the Lib Dems want to fight it, I imagine Labour will leave them be. The only way Labour are winning that is if the Lib Dems take a chunk out of the Tory vote, in which case they’re almost certainly taking a chunk out of Labour’s vote as well. Better to focus resources and expectations management on Reading West/Selby and Ainsty.
Logged
WD
Western Democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,577
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1778 on: May 17, 2023, 02:01:38 PM »

A Reading West-by election is more or less handing Labour a seat on a silver platter. Hilarious.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,555
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1779 on: May 17, 2023, 03:37:49 PM »

Whats the calculus on who should challenge in Bedfordshire?

It seems to flip back and forth between Labour and the Lib Dems - presumably Starmer would leave it to Davey, and focus on the other two, especially given what an uphill fight it would be?
If the Lib Dems want to fight it, I imagine Labour will leave them be. The only way Labour are winning that is if the Lib Dems take a chunk out of the Tory vote, in which case they’re almost certainly taking a chunk out of Labour’s vote as well. Better to focus resources and expectations management on Reading West/Selby and Ainsty.

The boundary changes are a factor there too, not because the new Mid Beds looks winnable for Labour but because a small bit of the old one goes into the new cross-county Hitchin constituency, which might be.  So Labour may want to put some effort in in that bit.

Meanwhile Reading West is in some ways the opposite situation to Selby & Ainsty: the current seat should be an easy gain in a by-election but the boundary changes take Labour's best bits out and replace them with some very rich and usually Tory (though some of it voted Lib Dem or Green earlier this month) Berkshire countryside (and rename it "Mid Berkshire", not that it's in the middle of the county or anything) which makes it a real long shot.  So if Labour win a by-election there the MP may not be an MP for very long.
Logged
Wiswylfen
eadmund
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 570


Political Matrix
E: -2.32, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1780 on: May 17, 2023, 04:11:54 PM »

Whats the calculus on who should challenge in Bedfordshire?

It seems to flip back and forth between Labour and the Lib Dems - presumably Starmer would leave it to Davey, and focus on the other two, especially given what an uphill fight it would be?
If the Lib Dems want to fight it, I imagine Labour will leave them be. The only way Labour are winning that is if the Lib Dems take a chunk out of the Tory vote, in which case they’re almost certainly taking a chunk out of Labour’s vote as well. Better to focus resources and expectations management on Reading West/Selby and Ainsty.

The boundary changes are a factor there too, not because the new Mid Beds looks winnable for Labour but because a small bit of the old one goes into the new cross-county Hitchin constituency, which might be.  So Labour may want to put some effort in in that bit.

Meanwhile Reading West is in some ways the opposite situation to Selby & Ainsty: the current seat should be an easy gain in a by-election but the boundary changes take Labour's best bits out and replace them with some very rich and usually Tory (though some of it voted Lib Dem or Green earlier this month) Berkshire countryside (and rename it "Mid Berkshire", not that it's in the middle of the county or anything) which makes it a real long shot.  So if Labour win a by-election there the MP may not be an MP for very long.

In current conditions I think an incumbent elected at a by-election would stand a good chance of holding it at the next GE.
Logged
Coldstream
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,997
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -6.59, S: 1.20

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1781 on: May 17, 2023, 04:53:40 PM »

Whats the calculus on who should challenge in Bedfordshire?

It seems to flip back and forth between Labour and the Lib Dems - presumably Starmer would leave it to Davey, and focus on the other two, especially given what an uphill fight it would be?
If the Lib Dems want to fight it, I imagine Labour will leave them be. The only way Labour are winning that is if the Lib Dems take a chunk out of the Tory vote, in which case they’re almost certainly taking a chunk out of Labour’s vote as well. Better to focus resources and expectations management on Reading West/Selby and Ainsty.

The boundary changes are a factor there too, not because the new Mid Beds looks winnable for Labour but because a small bit of the old one goes into the new cross-county Hitchin constituency, which might be.  So Labour may want to put some effort in in that bit.

Meanwhile Reading West is in some ways the opposite situation to Selby & Ainsty: the current seat should be an easy gain in a by-election but the boundary changes take Labour's best bits out and replace them with some very rich and usually Tory (though some of it voted Lib Dem or Green earlier this month) Berkshire countryside (and rename it "Mid Berkshire", not that it's in the middle of the county or anything) which makes it a real long shot.  So if Labour win a by-election there the MP may not be an MP for very long.

The (presumed) new Labour MP for Reading West may decide to seek selection in the new Reading seat - I’m fairly certain Matt Rodda hasn’t been reselected via trigger given that the constituency is changing so much.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,555
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1782 on: May 18, 2023, 01:41:16 AM »

The (presumed) new Labour MP for Reading West may decide to seek selection in the new Reading seat - I’m fairly certain Matt Rodda hasn’t been reselected via trigger given that the constituency is changing so much.

Labour have been doing reselections on the old boundaries, and it seems that he has been reselected for the existing Reading East.  Over two thirds of the new Reading comes from there, so I imagine he'll get that by default.

There's also the new Earley & Woodley, which should be a Labour target and for which they haven't selected a candidate yet.  But that only contains one ward from the existing Reading West.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,054
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1783 on: May 22, 2023, 05:30:33 AM »
« Edited: May 22, 2023, 05:58:24 AM by Torrain »


Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,835
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1784 on: May 22, 2023, 09:54:10 AM »

Recall petition is surely a formality, by-election in September is possible.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,054
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1785 on: May 22, 2023, 10:22:17 AM »

Yeah - both Labour and SNP have endorsed a recall (and subsequent by-election), so collecting signatures should be one of the easiest parts of the process.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,861


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1786 on: May 22, 2023, 02:28:37 PM »

Yeah - both Labour and SNP have endorsed a recall (and subsequent by-election), so collecting signatures should be one of the easiest parts of the process.

In part because it's a good by-election to fight (and even lose) for both parties. It's a dry run at what is likely to be the GE battlefield. Even under late 2021 political conditions I'd have this down as a 60-40 chance of Labour gain with the only difficulty being the 'hard sponginess' of the Tory vote and little else to squeeze other than direct switchers. At the moment, it should be more of a Labour cert...but there are some local issues and potential candidate issues that could muddy things. An SNP hold isn't yet a complete write off.

It's my hometown seat and I have some residual connections to some of the politiking there, but it's still early days.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,835
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1787 on: May 23, 2023, 09:53:17 AM »

In that context, it shouldn't be forgotten the Airdrie/Shotts contest in May 2021 was closer than some had expected - in an environment where the SNP was still hegemonic and ScotLab stagnant.

Though yes, it still has to be won!
Logged
icc
Rookie
**
Posts: 209
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1788 on: May 23, 2023, 10:31:41 AM »

One would expect the SNP by-election machine to be rather more polished than Labour's though, even now.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,835
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1789 on: May 24, 2023, 08:41:47 AM »

Labour will not want for volunteers in this one, that much is at least true.
Logged
Tintrlvr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,321


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1790 on: May 24, 2023, 09:10:08 AM »
« Edited: May 24, 2023, 09:14:21 AM by Tintrlvr »

In that context, it shouldn't be forgotten the Airdrie/Shotts contest in May 2021 was closer than some had expected - in an environment where the SNP was still hegemonic and ScotLab stagnant.

Though yes, it still has to be won!

Airdrie and Shotts was strategic squeeze - the SNP vote went up compared to 2019, the Labour vote just went up more (because there were more squeezable non-Labour unionists than non-SNP nationalists). But the unsqueezable rump Tory vote that would never vote Labour or SNP was still there, and otherwise there were no more votes to squeeze (other parties, including the LDs, got only 2.3% between them).

Labour obviously needs more than just strategic squeeze to win this by-election, they need direct SNP to Labour switchers.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,054
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1791 on: May 25, 2023, 05:20:31 AM »

Commons vote on suspending Ferrier is this evening.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,861


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1792 on: May 25, 2023, 07:44:51 AM »

Labour will not want for volunteers in this one, that much is at least true.

Might be the SNP's best asset if they deploy them...

Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,835
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1793 on: May 25, 2023, 09:00:46 AM »

Labour will not want for volunteers in this one, that much is at least true.

Might be the SNP's best asset if they deploy them...



Well both sides can at times make that claim tbf Wink
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,054
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1794 on: May 25, 2023, 11:01:01 AM »


*Hearing
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,835
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1795 on: May 27, 2023, 10:46:08 AM »
« Edited: May 27, 2023, 03:59:14 PM by CumbrianLefty »

Seems like pro-Johnson Tories and maybe "dissident" SNPers planned an "ambush" over the vote in the hope there wouldn't be enough MPs who agreed with the suspension just before the recess.

To be on the safe side, the division was pulled until parliament resumes next month. When there will be enough people present to set things finally in motion.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,054
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1796 on: May 27, 2023, 02:06:42 PM »

Aye - I’m partial to the speculation that *certain* Conservative MPs don’t want to set the precedent that an MP can be suspended from the Commons for reasons relating to COVID rule breaches…

But also, agree that the votes will be there to suspend her when the Commons comes back from recess. If Sunak couldn’t get that vote through, he’d probably be facing far more coordinated pushback than he is right now.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,835
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1797 on: May 28, 2023, 09:54:23 AM »

Oh there is no doubt it has the votes to pass in "normal" circumstances.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1798 on: May 30, 2023, 01:20:03 AM »

Seb Pain is apparently on the shortlist for Selby which opens the banter chance that he might have to fight a tricky by election… some poor staffer will have to listen to all his podcasts.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,054
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1799 on: May 30, 2023, 01:51:59 AM »
« Edited: June 01, 2023, 01:59:09 AM by Torrain »

Yeah - saw that Michael Crichton Crick had reported on that.

Honestly feel like this could go either way for Payne. If he loses a safe seat with a 20k majority, in a very high-profile by-election, it could be curtains for his political aspirations.

But we could end up having a number of by-elections in quick succession (the three MPs resigning to go to the Lords, and some combination of Ferrier and Johnson - not to mention other MPs embroiled in potential career-killing scandals like Benton, Warburton, Knight, Pincher etc). If Payne is one of, or the only Tory, to win a seat in that batch, he’d probably get a very kind write-up from outlets like the Spectator.

I’m still rooting for 5 simultaneous by-elections, just for the craic of a mini-election night.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 ... 126  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 9 queries.