HR 1 becoming law? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 05:27:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  HR 1 becoming law? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What are the chances HR 1 becomes law, passing the senate and house by the  time of the 2022 midterms?
#1
10-20%
#2
20-30%
#3
30-40%
#4
40-50%
#5
50-60%
#6
60-70%
#7
70-80%
#8
Almost certain it will be passed
#9
It will be DOA
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: HR 1 becoming law?  (Read 2636 times)
UncleSam
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,513


« on: March 04, 2021, 12:16:25 PM »

I’m not going to take any ‘anti-gerrymandering’ effort from Democrats seriously until they propose having computers draw the lines. The truth is Dems just want to gerrymander themselves but without even having to win state legislatures in the first place, which is objectively worse for Democracy than at least having to win something before rigging the system in your favor (though obviously both are awful and need to be done away with).

Banning voter ID laws pretty much falls under the same boat, though IMO Rs are equally bad on this issue. What we need is a centralized SSN list that just registers who voted and where every election, with one centralized voter registration list that gets updated automatically when people turn 18.

So ya basically this law is just pure political hackery outside of the campaign finance reform stuff. Hopefully banning super PACS gains traction on its’ own.
Logged
UncleSam
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,513


« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2021, 05:57:24 PM »

I’m not going to take any ‘anti-gerrymandering’ effort from Democrats seriously until they propose having computers draw the lines. The truth is Dems just want to gerrymander themselves but without even having to win state legislatures in the first place, which is objectively worse for Democracy than at least having to win something before rigging the system in your favor (though obviously both are awful and need to be done away with).

Who decides what algorithm the computer uses?
Obviously there would be some basic federal guidelines in terms of county splitting / compactness (as well as VRA), but otherwise just let 538 run everything imo
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 15 queries.