FT 19.02 Rural Health Act (Statute)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2024, 01:17:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  FT 19.02 Rural Health Act (Statute)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: FT 19.02 Rural Health Act (Statute)  (Read 738 times)
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 25, 2021, 08:33:25 PM »
« edited: April 24, 2021, 06:07:44 PM by Anna Komnene »

Quote
AN ACT
to improve rural health

Section 1 (Title & definitions)
i. The title of this act shall be, the "Rural Health Act."
ii. As it appears in this legislation, "depleted rural area" shall refer to communities so classified by the Ministry of Health and Human Services as having a shortage of healthcare workers.

Section 2 (Addressing the rural healthcare worker shortage)
i. The government shall appropriate a sum of $1 billion in the fiscal year of 2021 to finance a program of grants to students majoring in medicine and other healthcare-related fields to recompense up to 80% of their total educational expenses, including tuition, textbook fees, and room and board, who will agree to accept employment at a hospital, pharmacy, or healthcare clinic in a depleted rural area for five years after graduation.
ii. The government shall appropriate a further sum of $1 billion annually to finance a program of grants to hospitals and healthcare clinics in depleted rural areas to pay the salaries of doctors, nurses, and other healthcare workers hired after 1 April 2021.
(a) To qualify to receive this grant, the hospital or healthcare clinic must demonstrate
(1) the hired positions were necessary to adequately perform its mission; and
(2) the hospital or clinic would be otherwise unable to pay the salaries for the hired positions.
Sponsor: Harry S Truman

The floor is open.
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2021, 09:14:36 PM »

In the last few years we have seen a growing scarcity of healthcare workers in rural areas, as hospitals and clinics are forced to close for want of adequate staff. This bill would address the rural healthcare crisis by offering to recompense up to 80% of the educational expenses of medical graduates who agree to work for five years in a depleted rural area. It further appropriates funds to pay the salaries of these workers if the hospital or clinic in question is unable to do so.
Logged
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2021, 01:57:32 AM »
« Edited: February 26, 2021, 02:02:42 AM by Anna Komnene »

This is a pretty interesting solution to a difficult problem. It reminds me of Teach for America. TFA has its set of problems with retention and integration, but the five year term might help get more people who want to set up roots. Maybe it would help to have the hospitals set up programs to integrate members of this program into their community, as a condition of the grants.
Logged
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2021, 02:02:09 AM »

I'll introduce this amendment:

Quote
Section 2 (Addressing the rural healthcare worker shortage)
i. The government shall appropriate a sum of $1 billion in the fiscal year of 2021 to finance a program of grants to students majoring in medicine and other healthcare-related fields to recompense up to 80% of their total educational expenses, including tuition, textbook fees, and room and board, who will agree to accept employment at a hospital, pharmacy, or healthcare clinic in a depleted rural area for five years after graduation.
ii. The government shall appropriate a further sum of $1 billion annually to finance a program of grants to hospitals and healthcare clinics in depleted rural areas to pay the salaries of doctors, nurses, and other healthcare workers hired after 1 April 2021 and to provide programs meant to integrate said workers into their community.
(a) To qualify to receive this grant, the hospital or healthcare clinic must demonstrate
(1) the hired positions were necessary to adequately perform its mission; and
(2) the hospital or clinic would be otherwise unable to pay the salaries for the hired positions.
Logged
Amanda Huggenkiss
amanda dermichknutscht
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 658


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2021, 02:09:11 AM »

This is a very interesting proposal for a very severe problem. I support this, although it is somewhat unfortunate that the regional government can only make use of this lever because studying is so costly.

Maybe we should specify the exact moment by when medicine students should have to make this decision. I believe that this decision would be too early in the first semester, as students at that point are likely not able to set priorities that affect their future careers. Still, it should not be too late, so that students can enjoy the benefits of that program.
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2021, 02:11:16 AM »

Amendment is friendly.
Logged
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2021, 02:41:49 AM »

The amendment is adopted.
Logged
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2021, 10:55:32 AM »

Is this along the lines of what you're thinking Amanda?

Quote from:  amendment
i. The government shall appropriate a sum of $1 billion in the fiscal year of 2021 to finance a program of grants to students majoring in medicine and other healthcare-related fields to recompense up to 80% of their total educational expenses, including tuition, textbook fees, and room and board, who will agree to accept employment at a hospital, pharmacy, or healthcare clinic in a depleted rural area for five years after graduation.
(a) To be eligible to apply, an individual studying for a medical degree must have completed at least one year of medical school.
(b) An individual studying to be an RN nurse must have completed at least 1 semester of their program.
(c) An individual studying to be a BSN nurse must have completed at least 1 year of their program.
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2021, 10:28:01 PM »

I have no objection to that amendment.
Logged
Amanda Huggenkiss
amanda dermichknutscht
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 658


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 07, 2021, 03:22:57 AM »

Ah, thanks for the suggestion. Somehow missed this.

This goes in the right direction, but I'm not quite happy with that. As I stated before, I don't think we should pressure students to make such an impactful decision in or before their first semester, but I also don't think we should bar them the possibility to do so. I think students should have the opportunity to find their interests in the medical field before making this decision, but I don't see why this program should not include first-semester students when they have already come to that decision.

Now that I think about it, I don't really see why we would need ANY deadline for students to enroll in this program - after all, it only allocates grants; it does not provide any further specialization that healthcare workers in rural areas absolutely should have completed during their studies. I just want the wording of the bill to make sure that students will not be pressured to take a very consequential decision very early in their studies.

Offering this amendment:

Quote
Section 2 (Addressing the rural healthcare worker shortage)
i. The government shall appropriate a sum of $1 billion in the fiscal year of 2021 to finance a program of grants to students majoring in medicine and other healthcare-related fields to recompense up to 80% of their total educational expenses, including tuition, textbook fees, and room and board, who, at any time during their studies, will agree to accept employment at a hospital, pharmacy, or healthcare clinic in a depleted rural area for five years after graduation.
Logged
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2021, 03:43:40 PM »

I actually agree more with your original point. I think the issue could be because studying to be a doctor takes so long. It's basically 4 years of undergraduate + 4 years of medical school + 3+ years of residency = ~11 total years. So for doctors, in particular, you might see a higher drop out rate if people sign up as first years of undergrad, thinking they want to be a doctor, but not really being settled yet. I think the funding is retroactive the way it's currently written too, but maybe Truman could clarify on that point.

I'll object to the new amendment on that ground.
Logged
Amanda Huggenkiss
amanda dermichknutscht
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 658


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 08, 2021, 02:32:27 AM »

I think the funding is retroactive the way it's currently written too, but maybe Truman could clarify on that point.

If that is the case, I would happily drop my amendment.
Logged
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2021, 04:09:50 AM »

I think the funding is retroactive the way it's currently written too, but maybe Truman could clarify on that point.

If that is the case, I would happily drop my amendment.

It's the way I'm interpreting "recompense," but we could add an amendment to make sure it's crystal clear about the retroactive expenses too.
Logged
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2021, 07:51:35 PM »

Reading this again, I'm actually pretty certain costs from before and after applying would be included because it says "recompense up to 80% of their total educational expenses." Recompense and total being the keywords.
Logged
Amanda Huggenkiss
amanda dermichknutscht
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 658


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 09, 2021, 07:47:08 AM »

Good, if that is the case, I am withdrawing my amendment.
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,986
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 13, 2021, 01:44:40 AM »

Wouldn't it be better to recompense graduates after they've worked for 5 years in a rural area rather than during their studies? Otherwise the government will surely have to reclaim the grants from students who renege on their commitment, as some are bound to do.
Logged
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 15, 2021, 02:07:40 AM »

I'm not necessarily opposed to reimbursing upon completion, but I'm not sure what we would gain from switching to a student loan format.

What does everyone else think?
Logged
𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆
Battista Minola 1616
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,344
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -1.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 15, 2021, 08:42:39 AM »

I just think that the current proposal would self-evidently be appealing to more students than a recompense upon completion, which to me is an important point.
Logged
Amanda Huggenkiss
amanda dermichknutscht
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 658


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 15, 2021, 10:41:46 AM »

I just think that the current proposal would self-evidently be appealing to more students than a recompense upon completion, which to me is an important point.

I second this. I think it is very important to be as appealing as possible to students for the program to succeed.
Logged
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 16, 2021, 04:53:57 PM »

I could be wrong, but the sense I'm getting is that the majority want to keep the bill as is. So I'll motion for a final vote. 24 hours for objections.
Logged
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 18, 2021, 12:30:58 AM »

With no objections, we'll now have a final vote on this bill. Members please vote AYE, NAY, or ABSTAIN.

Quote
AN ACT
to improve rural health

Section 1 (Title & definitions)
i. The title of this act shall be, the "Rural Health Act."
ii. As it appears in this legislation, "depleted rural area" shall refer to communities so classified by the Ministry of Health and Human Services as having a shortage of healthcare workers.

Section 2 (Addressing the rural healthcare worker shortage)
i. The government shall appropriate a sum of $1 billion in the fiscal year of 2021 to finance a program of grants to students majoring in medicine and other healthcare-related fields to recompense up to 80% of their total educational expenses, including tuition, textbook fees, and room and board, who will agree to accept employment at a hospital, pharmacy, or healthcare clinic in a depleted rural area for five years after graduation.
(a) To be eligible to apply, an individual studying for a medical degree must have completed at least one year of medical school.
(b) An individual studying to be an RN nurse must have completed at least 1 semester of their program.
(c) An individual studying to be a BSN nurse must have completed at least 1 year of their program.
ii. The government shall appropriate a further sum of $1 billion annually to finance a program of grants to hospitals and healthcare clinics in depleted rural areas to pay the salaries of doctors, nurses, and other healthcare workers hired after 1 April 2021 and to provide programs meant to integrate said workers into their community.
(a) To qualify to receive this grant, the hospital or healthcare clinic must demonstrate
(1) the hired positions were necessary to adequately perform its mission; and
(2) the hospital or clinic would be otherwise unable to pay the salaries for the hired positions.
Logged
YE
Modadmin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,725


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: March 18, 2021, 12:36:32 AM »

Aye.
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: March 18, 2021, 12:36:50 AM »

Aye!
Logged
Amanda Huggenkiss
amanda dermichknutscht
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 658


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: March 18, 2021, 01:20:15 AM »

Aye.
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,986
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: March 18, 2021, 02:06:53 AM »

Abstention
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 12 queries.