Was "the Democrats will likely nominate a celebrity because Trump" the dumbest take of the election? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 08:20:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Was "the Democrats will likely nominate a celebrity because Trump" the dumbest take of the election? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Was "the Democrats will likely nominate a celebrity because Trump" the dumbest take of the election?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Was "the Democrats will likely nominate a celebrity because Trump" the dumbest take of the election?  (Read 713 times)
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,936
United States


P P
« on: February 24, 2021, 02:14:50 PM »

“Oprah will be the nominee” and “The Starbucks CEO will run as an independent and split the vote to guarantee a Trump win” were stupider IMO

Well, Schultz was seriously contemplating a presidential bid for some time before he ultimately decided not to go for it.  I recall seeing an interview of his by 60 Minutes during that speculative period. He seemed to be particularly concerned that someone like Bernie Sanders would obtain the nomination-which of course, ultimately didn't happen.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 15 queries.