VT - Lincoln Park Strategies/RepresentUs/VPIRG: Scott with a 80/13 favorability rating
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 12:27:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2022 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  VT - Lincoln Park Strategies/RepresentUs/VPIRG: Scott with a 80/13 favorability rating
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: VT - Lincoln Park Strategies/RepresentUs/VPIRG: Scott with a 80/13 favorability rating  (Read 1065 times)
VAR
VARepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 23, 2021, 06:11:44 PM »

February 16-18
500 registered voters
MoE: 4.8%

Phil Scott favorability:

Very favorable 32%
Favorable 47%
Favorable 80%
Unfavorable 8%
Very unfavorable 5%
Unfavorable 13%
Can’t rate 7%



Jim Condos favorability:

Very favorable 11%
Favorable 27%
Favorable 38%
Unfavorable 5%
Very unfavorable 3%
Unfavorable 8%
Can’t rate 54%



The Vermont State Legislature favorability:

Very favorable 11%
Favorable 47%
Favorable 58%
Unfavorable 11%
Very unfavorable 7%
Unfavorable 18%
Can’t rate 24%

Link
Logged
Thunder98
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,570
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2021, 06:24:41 PM »

Phil Scott may as be called Emperor of Vermont.  Sunglasses
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,771


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2021, 06:32:15 PM »

The numbers wouldn't surprise me but Lincoln Park Strategies had a pretty bad track record in 2020, although they didn't produce many surveys to begin with and all were sponsored by campaigns AFAIK.

They suggested Pete Sessions was only 3 points ahead (45%-42%) in the summer of 2020 and that Trump led in the same contest by only 48%-47%. Sessions won 56-41 and Trump won the same district 56-38.

In the MA-08 primary, they projected the race at Lynch 39, Goldstein 32 under a month out. Lynch won 66-34.
Logged
One Term Floridian
swamiG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,042


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2021, 06:36:55 PM »

The numbers wouldn't surprise me but Lincoln Park Strategies had a pretty bad track record in 2020, although they didn't produce many surveys to begin with and all were sponsored by campaigns AFAIK.

They suggested Pete Sessions was only 3 points ahead (45%-42%) in the summer of 2020 and that Trump led in the same contest by only 48%-47%. Sessions won 56-41 and Trump won the same district 56-38.

In the MA-08 primary, they projected the race at Lynch 39, Goldstein 32 under a month out. Lynch won 66-34.

Therefore it is possible Emperor Phil (God-VT) has a 100% actual rating
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,587
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2021, 07:46:29 PM »

Phil Scott may as be called Emperor of Vermont.  Sunglasses

A a kindred spirit, you will find I am the Chief Philist on this site.

Welcome!

Anyhow, glorious news!
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,776
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 23, 2021, 07:47:04 PM »

NE Rs have an unbeatable streak going
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,587
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2021, 07:48:01 PM »


Logged
One Term Floridian
swamiG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,042


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2021, 11:03:32 PM »


Biden needs to absolutely recruit this guy to switch. I mean look he's literally a NASCAR Democrat lmao
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,576
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2021, 01:54:13 PM »

Wow. Phil Scott is a KING.
Logged
Chips
Those Chips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,245
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 03, 2021, 03:23:22 PM »

WOW. Just goes to show how much being a liberal/moderate Republican can make a huge difference in states like Vermont.
Logged
Hope For A New Era
EastOfEden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,729


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2021, 09:35:04 PM »

And people somehow still believe that Republicans are more willing to vote for Democrats than the other way around.


Would a Democratic governor of Nebraska ever have this approval rating? Not a chance. Not even if he campaigned on building a wall.
Logged
DaleCooper
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,849


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2021, 10:43:02 PM »

And people somehow still believe that Republicans are more willing to vote for Democrats than the other way around.


Would a Democratic governor of Nebraska ever have this approval rating? Not a chance. Not even if he campaigned on building a wall.

Ben Nelson won almost every county when he got reelected to the Senate in 2006 against Pete Ricketts (our current GOP governor). I don't think that that's possible for now, but before 2010 Nebraska had a long history of electing Democrats throughout the 20th century.
Logged
Hope For A New Era
EastOfEden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,729


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 05, 2021, 10:45:03 PM »

And people somehow still believe that Republicans are more willing to vote for Democrats than the other way around.


Would a Democratic governor of Nebraska ever have this approval rating? Not a chance. Not even if he campaigned on building a wall.

Ben Nelson won almost every county when he got reelected to the Senate in 2006 against Pete Ricketts (our current GOP governor). I don't think that that's possible for now, but before 2010 Nebraska had a long history of electing Democrats throughout the 20th century.

Yes, I know. I was emphasizing that there has been a change in recent years.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,376
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 07, 2021, 01:42:27 AM »

And people somehow still believe that Republicans are more willing to vote for Democrats than the other way around.


Would a Democratic governor of Nebraska ever have this approval rating? Not a chance. Not even if he campaigned on building a wall.

Ben Nelson won almost every county when he got reelected to the Senate in 2006 against Pete Ricketts (our current GOP governor). I don't think that that's possible for now, but before 2010 Nebraska had a long history of electing Democrats throughout the 20th century.

Yes, I know. I was emphasizing that there has been a change in recent years.

In recent years Republican party essentially disappeared. The Trump's party took it's place and most past voters...
Logged
Anzeigenhauptmeister
Hades
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,373
Israel


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 07, 2021, 05:25:46 AM »

https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=416940
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 13 queries.