Regarding midwest trends, why do so many people forget W was very competitive in WI and PA?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:33:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Regarding midwest trends, why do so many people forget W was very competitive in WI and PA?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Regarding midwest trends, why do so many people forget W was very competitive in WI and PA?  (Read 1074 times)
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,964


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 31, 2021, 12:12:17 AM »

He lost WI by less than a point in 2004 AND 2000

lost PA by a decent margin in 2000, but only lost by like 2 in 2004.


Obama, due to midwest home base and economic feelings at the time of his terms, uniquely over performed in the midwest relative to national sentiments and margins.

2016 and 2020 look to me like a reversion to the mean in a sense.

Obviously what is true is that demographic voting habits in the MW over the last 20 years have changed substantially.


Ben Shapiro of all people made this observation in 2017 if i recall.

trump's midwest "surge" really does appear to simply have been an artifact of reversion to the mean.
Logged
Annatar
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 982
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2021, 03:04:12 AM »

Firstly you have to compare how states are voting relative to the nation, secondly, so many voters who could vote in 2004 are dead now, and so many new voters have entered the electorate via ageing into it and via naturalisation that the electorates in these states are totally different, you cannot just talk about reversion to the mean.

It is like saying Trump just did as well as Bush with Hispanics in many counties, the issue is so many new Hispanic voters have entered the electorate between 2004-2020 that you are dealing with a totally different voter base, you can't compare it to things 16 years ago.

Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,039
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2021, 12:22:14 PM »
« Edited: March 31, 2021, 12:26:12 PM by Roll Roons »

Firstly you have to compare how states are voting relative to the nation, secondly, so many voters who could vote in 2004 are dead now, and so many new voters have entered the electorate via ageing into it and via naturalisation that the electorates in these states are totally different, you cannot just talk about reversion to the mean.

It is like saying Trump just did as well as Bush with Hispanics in many counties, the issue is so many new Hispanic voters have entered the electorate between 2004-2020 that you are dealing with a totally different voter base, you can't compare it to things 16 years ago.



Even then, national popular vote isn't a great indicator. In the 2000s, Republicans kept it closer in California and got much bigger margins out of Texas compared to now, so they were much more competitive in the national PV.
Logged
Hope For A New Era
EastOfEden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2021, 12:43:56 PM »

While it's a reversion to the mean in terms of margins and overall state partisanship, it should be noted that there was a huge difference in coalitions between the two elections:

 
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,964


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2021, 03:32:25 PM »

I 100% understand that the county maps look very different 2016 v 2004

But my overall point is that the Midwest was billed (by political commentators from 2007-2016) as this blue brick wall despite the region being quite tight in 2000 and 2004
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,116
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2021, 05:14:49 PM »

For some reason people have this idea that Obama's performance was some sort of baseline when he was actually a once in a lifetime candidate who was uniquely suited to perform well in the Midwest.

Obama was the exception, not the rule.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2021, 07:09:05 PM »

For some reason people have this idea that Obama's performance was some sort of baseline when he was actually a once in a lifetime candidate who was uniquely suited to perform well in the Midwest.

Obama was the exception, not the rule.

Bill Clinton also did very well there. But yeah I guess he didn’t outperform there compared to his national performance to the same extent Obama did.
Logged
If my soul was made of stone
discovolante
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,244
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.13, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2021, 07:15:12 PM »

For some reason people have this idea that Obama's performance was some sort of baseline when he was actually a once in a lifetime candidate who was uniquely suited to perform well in the Midwest.

Obama was the exception, not the rule.

Bill Clinton also did very well there. But yeah I guess he didn’t outperform there compared to his national performance to the same extent Obama did.

Clinton won Wisconsin by about 4 points in 1992 and 10 points in 1996, with the traditionally conservative Fox Valley the main source of his gains. He won Pennsylvania by about 9 points each time, aided by convergent trends in the southwest and the Philadelphia suburbs. Come 2000, those gains had largely evaporated, and a lot of it didn't even come back under Obama.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2021, 05:56:15 PM »

People also seem to forget that Bush did better than Trump with Hispanics, including in the RGV and Miami-Dade. Another way you could argue Obama was the exception, not the rule, and this was a reversion to the mean.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,711
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2021, 09:34:50 AM »

You do remember that CO was competetive in 2004 due to Edwards, but due to Edwards being a lightweight on national security, Kerry was unable to carry it, if Gephardt was Veep he would have carried CO, NV, NM to win the the election since Ohio had a SSM ban on it
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.228 seconds with 12 queries.