Neal Katyal was last seen arguing for child slavery.
So I’m going to take a pass on him.
Prominent former SGs who also teach at Georgetown have allot of leeway in the clients they take and multinationals are not exactly hurting for representation and it’s not a criminal case in event. He absolutely did not
need to be arguing in front of the Supreme Court that corporations can’t be sued under the ATS.
When you couple his shameless corporate work with his ‘extreme centrist’ self description, it’s pretty clear that this is a guy who is on board with the Fedsoc’s extremist agenda to read any responsibility for excluding corporate actions from any sort of legal responsibilities while simultaneously inventing special rights for them whole cloth(see basically every FAA case for the last 30 years) but like, doesn’t want to undue Roe any more than necessary.
Those people don’t belong on any federal court.
Poll
