Opinion of Del Tachi?

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

He is the walking definition of an HP.
Honestly he should have been banned if you were going to ban Sanchez (he was also defending the terrorists) Although I personally prefer removing their insult/personal attack protections instead.
Sad thing is, he isn’t a cultist, just a genuinely despicable person who made a Faustian bargain with a genocidal dictator for a tax cut and a SCOTUS justice, like many blues here.

He probably made a Faustian bargain but he definitely didn't make it for a SCOTUS justice and a tax cut lmao

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

I find him utterly lacking in sophistication, and you can interpret that however you want. HP.

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

In the sense that 3 ml of water is a "certain amount", I think we agree!

I completely disagree, I think he is quite sophisticated. Now, whether that's a good or bad thing, given how he uses his intellectual standing... that's up to you.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

I find him utterly lacking in sophistication, and you can interpret that however you want. HP.

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

In the sense that 3 ml of water is a "certain amount", I think we agree!

I completely disagree, I think he is quite sophisticated. Now, whether that's a good or bad thing, given how he uses his intellectual standing... that's up to you.

He's sophisticated in the same way Calvin Candie was sophisticated.

Then it's good that I have no idea what Calvin Candie was.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

I find him utterly lacking in sophistication, and you can interpret that however you want. HP.

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

In the sense that 3 ml of water is a "certain amount", I think we agree!

I completely disagree, I think he is quite sophisticated. Now, whether that's a good or bad thing, given how he uses his intellectual standing... that's up to you.

He's sophisticated in the same way Calvin Candie was sophisticated.

Then it's good that I have no idea what Calvin Candie was.

That's about as far from good as possible. Everyone should know who Calvin Candie is.

Nah, Tarantino movies are garbage including Django.

Ah so it's a character from Django Unchained? Never seen it.
However I've watched Pulp Fiction and Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, and your take is very very bad.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

That the mob, as some sort of reward for their actions, should be allowed to dictate exactly how a new American system of government will work. Saying that a few thousand violent extremists should be able to impose their agenda unilaterally on the rest of the country? That’s not clever, sophisticated or intellectual. It’s just straight up moronic.

Oclocracy is definitely moronic, but I don't see why it can't be sophisticated and intellectual as well.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

Not only that, but he's also basically arguing for absolute majoritarian rule with no protections for the political minority. No procedure, no constitution, just mob rule. That's how liberalism dies. Plus his (and Scott's) take that the system is fundamentally broken and that we should welcome violence as an opportunity for revolution is just dumb.

Liberalism Dies In Darkness

(if I recall correctly you are a fan of the Washington Post right?)