Opinion of Del Tachi?

[TheReckoning]

One of the few people who still has a Trump sticker on his profile.

[VAR]

One of the few people who still has a Trump sticker on his profile.

I don't think he could remove it even if he wanted to. Anyway, FF

[Badger]

Apologist for the Trump's part in the Capitol take over. HP previously, demonstrated and Amplified massively in recent days.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

[Sol]

One of a coterie of posters who I agree with a remarkable number of things but who I fundamentally disagree with prejudice with once you get down to the brass tacks of actual ideology. HP.

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

FF, insightful poster.

[Penn_Quaker_Girl]

We don't agree on everything, but Del Tachi is one of the brightest posters on Atlas (and no slight to anybody else: we have a lot of those here). 

[100% pro-life no matter what]

One of the few people who still has a Trump sticker on his profile.

I don't think he could remove it even if he wanted to. Anyway, FF

You can remove it by unchecking "display mock election vote on profile" (or something like that) in your settings.  I did that after the events of 1/6.

But, anyway, while I don't agree with him on everything, he is unquestionably a good poster and can always defend his views.

[Kamala's side hoe]

Unqualified FF outside of political views. The best Trumpist R-avatar on here hands down. (Dr. RI is not a Trumpist in my book, nor are any of the other high-effort R-avatar posters)

[It’s so Joever]

He is the walking definition of an HP.
Honestly he should have been banned if you were going to ban Sanchez (he was also defending the terrorists) Although I personally prefer removing their insult/personal attack protections instead.
Sad thing is, he isn’t a cultist, just a genuinely despicable person who made a Faustian bargain with a genocidal dictator for a tax cut and a SCOTUS justice, like many blues here.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

He is the walking definition of an HP.
Honestly he should have been banned if you were going to ban Sanchez (he was also defending the terrorists) Although I personally prefer removing their insult/personal attack protections instead.
Sad thing is, he isn’t a cultist, just a genuinely despicable person who made a Faustian bargain with a genocidal dictator for a tax cut and a SCOTUS justice, like many blues here.

He probably made a Faustian bargain but he definitely didn't make it for a SCOTUS justice and a tax cut lmao

[Horus]

Neoconfederate. Would gladly trade him for Sanchez.

[SevenEleven]

I find him utterly lacking in sophistication, and you can interpret that however you want. HP.

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

In the sense that 3 ml of water is a "certain amount", I think we agree!

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

I find him utterly lacking in sophistication, and you can interpret that however you want. HP.

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

In the sense that 3 ml of water is a "certain amount", I think we agree!

I completely disagree, I think he is quite sophisticated. Now, whether that's a good or bad thing, given how he uses his intellectual standing... that's up to you.

[SevenEleven]

I find him utterly lacking in sophistication, and you can interpret that however you want. HP.

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

In the sense that 3 ml of water is a "certain amount", I think we agree!

I completely disagree, I think he is quite sophisticated. Now, whether that's a good or bad thing, given how he uses his intellectual standing... that's up to you.

To be fair, I've had him on ignore ever since I noticed the racist garbage he likes to post, but recently I recall an incident where this poster was bragging to John Dule about rolling around in his own filth, as if he were living on a farm and kept in a pen, to eat from a trough.

[Horus]

I find him utterly lacking in sophistication, and you can interpret that however you want. HP.

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

In the sense that 3 ml of water is a "certain amount", I think we agree!

I completely disagree, I think he is quite sophisticated. Now, whether that's a good or bad thing, given how he uses his intellectual standing... that's up to you.

He's sophisticated in the same way Calvin Candie was sophisticated.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

I find him utterly lacking in sophistication, and you can interpret that however you want. HP.

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

In the sense that 3 ml of water is a "certain amount", I think we agree!

I completely disagree, I think he is quite sophisticated. Now, whether that's a good or bad thing, given how he uses his intellectual standing... that's up to you.

He's sophisticated in the same way Calvin Candie was sophisticated.

Then it's good that I have no idea what Calvin Candie was.

[SevenEleven]

I find him utterly lacking in sophistication, and you can interpret that however you want. HP.

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

In the sense that 3 ml of water is a "certain amount", I think we agree!

I completely disagree, I think he is quite sophisticated. Now, whether that's a good or bad thing, given how he uses his intellectual standing... that's up to you.

He's sophisticated in the same way Calvin Candie was sophisticated.

Then it's good that I have no idea what Calvin Candie was.

That's about as far from good as possible. Everyone should know who Calvin Candie is.

[ProgressiveModerate]

A political ideology I personally disagree with and honestly can't wrap my head around but still a good person and poster nonetheless.

[RI]

I find him utterly lacking in sophistication, and you can interpret that however you want. HP.

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

In the sense that 3 ml of water is a "certain amount", I think we agree!

I completely disagree, I think he is quite sophisticated. Now, whether that's a good or bad thing, given how he uses his intellectual standing... that's up to you.

He's sophisticated in the same way Calvin Candie was sophisticated.

Then it's good that I have no idea what Calvin Candie was.

That's about as far from good as possible. Everyone should know who Calvin Candie is.

Nah, Tarantino movies are garbage including Django.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

I find him utterly lacking in sophistication, and you can interpret that however you want. HP.

He is a smug deplorable with a certain amount of intellectual standing.

In the sense that 3 ml of water is a "certain amount", I think we agree!

I completely disagree, I think he is quite sophisticated. Now, whether that's a good or bad thing, given how he uses his intellectual standing... that's up to you.

He's sophisticated in the same way Calvin Candie was sophisticated.

Then it's good that I have no idea what Calvin Candie was.

That's about as far from good as possible. Everyone should know who Calvin Candie is.

Nah, Tarantino movies are garbage including Django.

Ah so it's a character from Django Unchained? Never seen it.
However I've watched Pulp Fiction and Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, and your take is very very bad.

[Modernity has failed us]

His comments in the capitol siege thread were reprehensible.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Taking a nihilistic approach to politics b/c "LOL, it's just a game" = Automatic HP

[TheReckoning]

His comments in the capitol siege thread were reprehensible.

What’d he say?

[Starry Eyed Jagaloon]

His comments in the capitol siege thread were reprehensible.

What’d he say?

Basically that Democrats are to blame for Republicans wanting to do this and that if the mob no longer trusts American democracy, our country deserves to be torn down and rebuilt from the ashes. Basically the worst possible fusion of resentment politics and social contract theory.