It’s a bit astonishing that NE-02 was so Republican before 2008, since it’s anchored by a city as large as Omaha. I mean, it voted for Bush in 2004 by more than the entire state of South Dakota!
And that's where the formulation of my question seems to be flawed. 😕
In hindsight, a sharp shift towards Obama seemed more consequential in NE-02 than in Indiana, particularly in the long view.
If you, however, take a look at the
2008 Atlas prediction statistics, more members believed in a party switch in
Indiana (17.25%) than in
NE-02 (5.03%) - contrary to the interim result of my poll.
Back then, them Hoosiers were obviously deemed more liberal and willing to change sides than them Omahans.
Even the 2004 United States presidential election results yielded a corresponding prognostication; Bush had won Nebraska's district by 21.7%, Indiana by "merely" 20.7%. Consequently, an Obama victory in Indiana seemed a tad more probable.