Biden did better in Minnesota than Trump did in Texas (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:07:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Biden did better in Minnesota than Trump did in Texas (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Biden did better in Minnesota than Trump did in Texas  (Read 4869 times)
prag_prog
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 426
United States


« on: December 13, 2020, 02:21:03 AM »

Both the federal and state house totals in MN were slightly more R than the national average, and the presidential margin was just 2 points to the left of the nation. Texas was much more R than the nation in any of these three metrics

Though the claim that "X state will easily vote for Y party" when Y party literally just lost X state by more than they lost the NPV is probably either wishful thinking with cherry-picking of data or hyperbolic satire.        
weed parties have something to do with that
Logged
prag_prog
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 426
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2020, 02:51:35 PM »

I did some number crunching and here is how MN broke down this election. 69% of the state's vote (~1.9M) came from the 8 counties that include Hennepin / Ramsey + the counties that touch these two counties. 31% (855k) votes came from all other counties in the state.

Overall, in the 8 county region, Biden got 62.6% of the two party vote, while in the rest of the state, he got 40.8%. Trump would have needed to get 77% of the Greater MN vote, given the MSP results.

Based on these numbers, it definitely looks like the R path through MN runs through the suburbs and not rural MN. The numbers just aren't there in the rural parts of the state.

Notably, if you took out all the suburbs (i.e., if the state only contained the Twin Cities themselves and Greater MN), Biden would have still won the state with 50.8% (862K - 835K). This likely means that a R win would involve actually winning the combined suburban vote, not just cutting the margins.


                       Trump     Biden        Biden%  Total Votes
Twin Cities           54,584    325,389    85.6%     379,973
Inner Suburbs     228,765   418,854    64.7%     647,619
Middle Suburbs   288,304   336,213     53.8%     624,517
Outer Suburbs    131,854     99,244     42.9%     231,098
Total MSP Met 703,507 1,179,700    62.6%  1,883,207
Greater MN         780,558    537,377    40.8%     855,615
Total MN      1,484,065 1,717,077    53.6%  2,738,822
 


Twin Cities = Minneapolis & St. Paul Cities
Inner Suburbs = Suburban Hennpin and Ramsey
Middle Suburbs = Dakota, Washington, Anoka
Outer Suburbs = Scott, Carver, Wright
Greater MN = Everything Else



You hvae the Total Vote count in Greater MN and Total MN wrong
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 10 queries.