Biden did better in Minnesota than Trump did in Texas
Tekken_Guy:
By that logic Trump did better in Florida than Biden did in Michigan.
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY:
Quote from: Tekken_Guy on December 12, 2020, 11:31:31 PM
By that logic Trump did better in Florida than Biden did in Michigan.
Yes. And?
Nyvin:
Quote from: Tekken_Guy on December 12, 2020, 11:31:31 PM
By that logic Trump did better in Florida than Biden did in Michigan.
That's correct.
Quote from: Chips on December 12, 2020, 09:33:36 PM
Both are about equal with each other in terms of how winnable it is for either party. While both could flip in a good year for their party, Neither of them are voting for the other party in a close election anytime soon.
Although it would at least appear that both are trending Dem, so arguably Texas is more winnable for Dems than Minn is for Republicans.
neostassenite31:
Both the federal and state house totals in MN were slightly more R than the national average, and the presidential margin was just 2 points to the left of the nation. Texas was much more R than the nation in any of these three metrics
Though the claim that "X state will easily vote for Y party" when Y party literally just lost X state by more than they lost the NPV is probably either wishful thinking with cherry-picking of data or hyperbolic satire.
Antonio the Sixth:
Quote from: All eyes have seen the glory of the crushing of the Trump on December 12, 2020, 08:26:57 PM
Minnesota is now more partisan than Texas. Hahahaha oh yes, love that little factoid about this election.
I mean, partisanship has to be measured in relative terms. MN is 3 points to the left of the nation and TX 10 points to the right. But yeah, it says something about the extent of Biden's victory that in raw terms he won MN by more than he lost TX.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page