Young Supreme court justices
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 02:15:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Young Supreme court justices
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Young Supreme court justices  (Read 438 times)
cwh2018
Rookie
**
Posts: 109
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 06, 2021, 09:31:57 AM »

What is the youngest age that a supreme court nominee could be and get confirmed to the court?
Are you surprised that nominees have stayed around the 50 age bracket, especially after Thomas was confirmed to the court at 43.  Is there a possibility of anyone beating Douglas who was 40 when confirmed?  You have to go back to before the civil war to beat Douglas.

While we all new Barrett was the odds-on favourite for the Ginsburg seat, if Trump had nominated judge Rushing who was only 38, would she have been confirmed without a problem.
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,720
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2021, 12:42:22 PM »

What is the youngest age that a supreme court nominee could be and get confirmed to the court?

Probably ~37 or so, you don't want the nominee open to accusations that they've spent too short a time (<~12 years) accruing meaningful legal experience. Even still, though, a nominee in their 30s would still get people saying they're too young; it just depends on whether or not their experience up 'til then actually bears that out.

Are you surprised that nominees have stayed around the 50 age bracket, especially after Thomas was confirmed to the court at 43. 

Not really, Thomas being nominated so young could arguably just be considered a relative aberration like the Bork nomination's utter & complete implosion was.

Is there a possibility of anyone beating Douglas who was 40 when confirmed?  You have to go back to before the civil war to beat Douglas.

If a Republican were to take back the White House in 2025, then I could see current district judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle nominated on a time-scale akin to Thomas' upward mobility: nominated to the 11th or D.C. Circuit in the 1st year of the presidency, then tapped for SCOTUS in the 2nd. Even if she had to wait to be nominated 'til just before the 2026 midterms like Kavanaugh was in 2018, she'd still only be 39.

While we all new Barrett was the odds-on favourite for the Ginsburg seat, if Trump had nominated judge Rushing who was only 38, would she have been confirmed without a problem.

Yes, because party over country, though in such an instance, I could see somebody like Romney doing something akin to what Murkowski had already done in real life & saying that although he wouldn't have nominated somebody quite so young, he'd still vote to confirm since the nomination was already made (so the vote's gonna be held anyway) & perhaps because the quality of the confirmation process had led him to consider the nominee to be qualified too.
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2021, 04:54:51 AM »

I guess someone who just graduated law school would be earliest plausible nominee.
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,880
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2021, 01:58:24 PM »

I guess someone who just graduated law school would be earliest plausible nominee.

Stepping into the range of non-plausible nominees, is there any requirement for SC justice? Or could Biden nominate say, a newborn baby if he wanted?
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2021, 02:06:26 PM »
« Edited: February 09, 2021, 10:21:18 PM by NewYorkExpress »

I guess someone who just graduated law school would be earliest plausible nominee.

Stepping into the range of non-plausible nominees, is there any requirement for SC justice? Or could Biden nominate say, a newborn baby if he wanted?

I don't believe there actually is an age requirement in the constitution, but I can't imagine a President of either party nominating a newborn baby, and I certainly can't imagine a Senate  confirming a newborn baby if one was nominated.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,424


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2021, 09:12:25 PM »

I guess someone who just graduated law school would be earliest plausible nominee.

Stepping into the range of non-plausible nominees, is there any requirement for SC justice? Or could Biden nominate say, a newborn baby if he wanted?

There are no constitutional qualifications for SCOTUS whatsoever. It's like Governor of Kansas.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.224 seconds with 14 queries.