Why was Obama so strong in the Dakotas? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 08:57:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was Obama so strong in the Dakotas? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was Obama so strong in the Dakotas?  (Read 1201 times)
Catalyst138
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 833
United States


« on: December 05, 2020, 01:46:05 PM »

Obama got both North and South Dakota within single digits in 2008 despite Kerry losing them by 20-25 points. North Dakota had the third largest leftward swing behind Hawaii and Indiana, and it was genuinely considered a swing state in the lead up to the election.

Even in 2012, which was a reversion to the mean for many states, Obama still lost the Dakotas by less than 20 points, still noticeably better than Kerry and Gore. But just 4 years later, Trump destroyed Hillary in both states by over 30 points. The state with the largest Republican swing in 2016 wasn’t Iowa or Maine, but North Dakota! It seems as if Obama had some sort of appeal to these two ruby-red states that a generic Democrat doesn’t, but what is it?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.