Why was Obama so strong in the Dakotas? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 04:10:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was Obama so strong in the Dakotas? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was Obama so strong in the Dakotas?  (Read 1194 times)
💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)
peenie_weenie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,476
United States


« on: December 05, 2020, 03:44:02 PM »

In 2008 Obama did really well in parts of the rural midwest with residual statewide party strength. The South Dakota Dems and the D-NPL still had residual appeal in rural Scandinavian areas of the state (3/4 of Dakota Senators were Democratic in 2008).

E.g., here's a Swedish ancestry map (source: Wikimedia)


Western parts of these states are sparser and most industry is ranching (before the oil boom at least) so liberal politics were never going to be appealing there. But east of the Missouri you see a lot of Scandinavian farmers.



(note that NE corner also has a reservation)



(Heitkamp basically won all of these Eastern counties in 2012 and even won most of them in 2018)

for reference here's the Minnesota map in 2008 - similarly Obama had a lot of strength in western and southeastern parts of the state that are heavily Scandinavian (and also coterminous with the areas he won in the Dakotas)



The bottom fell out in all of these places with the oil boom and general urban/rural polarization.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.