Is Maine back to being a Safe D state on the presidential level? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 02:42:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Is Maine back to being a Safe D state on the presidential level? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is Maine back to being a Safe D state on the presidential level?  (Read 1005 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« on: November 21, 2020, 02:48:10 PM »

Can Maine Dems gerrymander its congressional districts so both voted for Biden without sacrificing either seat?

Sure, by moving Lewiston into district 1 and moving some coastal areas north/east of Portland into district 2. This would make both districts D-leaning.

This isn’t as easy as you think. Portland City (obviously) and then South Portland/Brunswick are the bulk of Democratic strength in the First District, most of the other outlying/coastal areas are also fairly D but not as strongly D (except for Yarmouth, Falmouth, Cumberland) or not as populous. There’s no way you can add enough D areas of CD-1 into CD-2 to make CD-2 reliably Democratic-leaning without risking a far more competitive CD-1. it’s mostly a matter of population and Portland's geographic location, although the maps wouldn’t be clean either -- you can add Brunswick but Portland/South Portland is more difficult and obviously not a compact map/a blatant gerrymander.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 13 queries.