Human aging reversed, telomeres lengthened, in world first (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:22:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  Human aging reversed, telomeres lengthened, in world first (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Human aging reversed, telomeres lengthened, in world first  (Read 794 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« on: November 19, 2020, 02:01:24 AM »

From the ashes a fire shall be woken,
A light from the shadows shall spring;
Renewed shall be blade that was broken,
The crownless again shall be king queen.

You broke the rhyme scheme.  Besides even if she were to live to be 164, she still wouldn't become president, unless by some mischance, she were running against Trump in a rematch, and she'd probably lose that too.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2020, 09:03:01 AM »

From the ashes a fire shall be woken,
A light from the shadows shall spring;
Renewed shall be blade that was broken,
The crownless again shall be king queen.

You broke the rhyme scheme.  Besides even if she were to live to be 164, she still wouldn't become president, unless by some mischance, she were running against Trump in a rematch, and she'd probably lose that too.

I could be optimistic, but she could probably beat Lauren Boebert or Richard Spencer or whoever Republicans are going to nominate in 2028

You are optimistic. Despite being a decent policy wonk and behind-the-scenes operator, she's repeatedly shown she's terrible at retail politics. As I have often said, the worst thing about 2016 was that the Republicans didn't need Trump to beat Clinton.  Most Republicans they could have run would likely have won the PV too. (Keep in mind that she only got a plurality.  Indeed, she, Bill, and Al share the dubious distinction of repeatedly getting a plurality of the PV and never a majority.) She only won her Senate seat because she was able to use the advantage of being First Lady to clear the way for her in the primary, and despite doing worse than both Moynihan before her and Gillibrand after her, not even she could lose New York Senate seat with a D beside her name. The only positive she brings to a future campaign is that she has clearly shown that ahe can beat Howie Hawkins, so she wouldn't have to worry about the Green Party.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.