Alaska's partisan lean in presidential elections
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 07:31:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Alaska's partisan lean in presidential elections
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Alaska's partisan lean in presidential elections  (Read 1655 times)
prag_prog
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 426
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 16, 2020, 05:46:57 PM »

Alaska's partisan lean in presidential elections since 1996 (didn't start from 1992 due to significant 3rd party vote) -

1996: R+26
2000: R+31
2004: R+23
2008: R+30
2012: R+18
2016: R+17
2020: R+14 (likely to be somewhere in between R+13 & R+15 once after full counting is done)
 
Biden also is on track to receive the highest share for a Dem in Alaska since 1960's.
 
I don't know much about Alaskan politics. Only thing I know is that Anchorage is becoming more blue with each cycle. For those who have insight on Alaskan politics, what's the reason behind Alaska's trend towards Dems in the last decade? Is this trend sustainable enough for Alaska to become a battleground state by say 2036?
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,644
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2020, 10:21:34 PM »

I think it's a combination of environmentalists increasingly moving in + Anchorage being an ancestral R metro area primed to flip like Phoenix and the Atlanta suburbs?
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2020, 05:41:12 PM »

Alaska's becoming more diverse and educated with each passing cycle. I believe it was Nate Cohn who said Alaska is just a dark, cold sunbelt state in its political trends.
Logged
TopShelfGoal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 322


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2020, 11:30:34 PM »

What the percentages hide is the small raw vote difference. This year AK will be decided by just around ~36k votes. Its small size makes it extra sensitive to population shifts. If I were a D strategist, I would be encouraging Biden to provide incentives for Big Tech to open satellite offices in Anchorage and have some government contractors to open up locations up there as well.
Logged
It’s so Joever
Forumlurker161
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,985


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2020, 02:47:44 PM »

What the percentages hide is the small raw vote difference. This year AK will be decided by just around ~36k votes. Its small size makes it extra sensitive to population shifts. If I were a D strategist, I would be encouraging Biden to provide incentives for Big Tech to open satellite offices in Anchorage and have some government contractors to open up locations up there as well.
He also should do it in Idaho.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2020, 04:44:16 PM »

I think AK has the biggest potential to turn into the VT of our generation/-s in terms of undergoing a dramatic long-term political shift which completely changes the way we think about the state.
Logged
MillennialModerate
MillennialMAModerate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,016
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 23, 2020, 08:52:38 PM »

Alaska's partisan lean in presidential elections since 1996 (didn't start from 1992 due to significant 3rd party vote) -

1996: R+26
2000: R+31
2004: R+23
2008: R+30
2012: R+18
2016: R+17
2020: R+14 (likely to be somewhere in between R+13 & R+15 once after full counting is done)
 
Is this trend sustainable enough for Alaska to become a battleground state by say 2036?

2000: R+31
2004: R+23
2008: R+30 (Palin)
2012: R+18
2016: R+17
2020: R+10

That’s an obvious trend

I think you could see it a true tossup in 2028
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,617
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 23, 2020, 08:56:16 PM »

I will live to see Blueaska. What a blessed thing.
Logged
prag_prog
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 426
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 26, 2020, 04:57:44 PM »

Alaska's partisan lean in presidential elections since 1996 (didn't start from 1992 due to significant 3rd party vote) -

1996: R+26
2000: R+31
2004: R+23
2008: R+30
2012: R+18
2016: R+17
2020: R+14 (likely to be somewhere in between R+13 & R+15 once after full counting is done)
 
Is this trend sustainable enough for Alaska to become a battleground state by say 2036?

2000: R+31
2004: R+23
2008: R+30 (Palin)
2012: R+18
2016: R+17
2020: R+10

That’s an obvious trend

I think you could see it a true tossup in 2028
I forgot about Palin. It makes sense now why 2008 didn't follow the trend
Logged
EastwoodS
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,853


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2020, 06:05:28 PM »

What the percentages hide is the small raw vote difference. This year AK will be decided by just around ~36k votes. Its small size makes it extra sensitive to population shifts. If I were a D strategist, I would be encouraging Biden to provide incentives for Big Tech to open satellite offices in Anchorage and have some government contractors to open up locations up there as well.
He also should do it in Idaho.
No keep your bullsh**t in your blue hell holes
Logged
It’s so Joever
Forumlurker161
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,985


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 26, 2020, 06:09:27 PM »

What the percentages hide is the small raw vote difference. This year AK will be decided by just around ~36k votes. Its small size makes it extra sensitive to population shifts. If I were a D strategist, I would be encouraging Biden to provide incentives for Big Tech to open satellite offices in Anchorage and have some government contractors to open up locations up there as well.
He also should do it in Idaho.
No keep your bullsh**t in your blue hell holes
Sir, we prefer the term “cesspools”.
Logged
DabbingSanta
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,679
United States
P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 26, 2020, 06:38:45 PM »

Alaska has always been diverse.  There is a strong native/white split in the population, and I would assume that the natives don't turnout to vote at the same rate the white folks do.  Campaigning in such a huge state for such a small prize might not be worth it from a logistical standpoint. It is very isolated with certain parts of the state not even connected by road.  It is also a super long flight.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 11 queries.