The Oklahoma primary paradox
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 22, 2025, 09:13:44 AM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election
  The Oklahoma primary paradox
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Oklahoma primary paradox  (Read 677 times)
I need an explanation
Rookie
**
Posts: 238
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 11, 2020, 10:42:45 PM »

Why did Oklahoma swing so far away from Sanders in 2020?

Same thing happened to Hillary in 2016.

Do they just hate retread candidates?

Or did the just see Sanders as the lesser evil in 2016 and weren’t really “for” him?

Obama also got a lot of protests in 2012 after losing big to Clinton in 2008. So Clinton lost because she was too much like Obama in 2016?

Did they actually like Hillary in 2008, or was she just a lesser evil too?

If they hated Obama so much that even Clinton was too much like him, why would they go with Biden, Obama’s VP, over Sanders who they supported last time?

They went their own way all the way back in 2004 too.

I think the only conclusion here is Oklahoma likes to troll.

Logged
I need an explanation
Rookie
**
Posts: 238
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2020, 10:55:53 PM »

West Virginia is also like this, (Hillary 2008, Many Protests 2012, Bernie 2016, Biden 2020) though Biden was the last one standing by then. I wonder how it would have turned out if Bernie had still been in for WV in 2020.
Logged
Bootes Void
iamaganster123
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,677
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2020, 11:08:12 PM »

rural voters abandoned Bernie in droves
Logged
I need an explanation
Rookie
**
Posts: 238
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2020, 11:17:36 PM »

rural voters abandoned Bernie in droves

But then why did they support him in the first place?
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,682
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2020, 11:18:55 PM »

rural voters abandoned Bernie in droves

But then why did they support him in the first place?

Because he wasn't Hillary
Logged
I need an explanation
Rookie
**
Posts: 238
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2020, 11:20:10 PM »


They didn’t have a problem with Hillary in 2008 though,
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,901
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2020, 11:24:08 PM »


They didn’t have a problem with Hillary in 2008 though,

Eight years of hating Obama (who she was tied closely to) and right-wing media conditioning them to hate Hillary for her inevitable run (remember Benghazi?) changed that.
Logged
I need an explanation
Rookie
**
Posts: 238
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2020, 11:25:29 PM »


They didn’t have a problem with Hillary in 2008 though,

Eight years of hating Obama (who she was tied closely to) and right-wing media conditioning them to hate Hillary for her inevitable run (remember Benghazi?) changed that.

The only problem with that analysis is that Biden was tied even more to Obama as his own VP.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,901
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2020, 11:28:03 PM »
« Edited: November 11, 2020, 11:32:54 PM by Alben Barkley »


They didn’t have a problem with Hillary in 2008 though,

Eight years of hating Obama (who she was tied closely to) and right-wing media conditioning them to hate Hillary for her inevitable run (remember Benghazi?) changed that.

The only problem with that analysis is that Biden was tied even more to Obama as his own VP.


But he didn’t get the 24/7 media hate and BENGHAZI hysteria. Because they never expected him to run and knew she would.

Also, woman vs. white man does matter. Honestly, she doubtless got at least SOME votes in 2008 for not being the black man. For some of these people, the hierarchy is white man>white woman>black man.

Although there’s also the fact that Bill Clinton’s presidency was both closer in time AND remembered more fondly by these people in 2008 than it was in 2016. A lot of shifts accelerating them farther away from Democrats in general happened during that time. We can argue about how much of that was due to racism and other factors, but it’s undeniable that right after 2008, WWC started fleeing the Democratic Party in droves.

And finally, some of it is probably just down to personality. Both Hillary and Obama are kinda reserved intellectual policy wonk types who use big words and are seen by many as “elitists.” Obama has more charisma, but it’s a different kind that doesn’t resonate as well with rural WWC. Biden has more of the “I’d like to have a beer with him” folksy charm than either. It’s a bit closer to Bill Clinton or George W. Bush’s appeal.
Logged
TML
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,111


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2020, 11:40:46 PM »

In terms of Oklahoma in 2020, it should be noted that another factor for Biden's victory over Sanders was the activity in the last three days before Super Tuesday (i.e. Buttigieg & Klobuchar dropping out and endorsing Biden). Exit polls indicated that half of primary voters in OK made up their minds within the last few days before ST, and this group broke overwhelmingly for Biden. The other half which had decided earlier went narrowly for Sanders. A similar pattern played out in several other states where late deciders made up at least 40% of all primary voters - in each case, it was enough to either swing the state to Biden or make him win by a larger than expected margin.
Logged
Hammy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,701
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2020, 11:55:03 PM »

In 2008 there were a lot of Republicans and conservative Dems casting Stop Obama votes, and those voters were casting Stop Hillary in 2016.  Just look at Obama's performance in those states in the 2012 primary as well.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,067
Slovakia


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: 0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2020, 12:42:01 AM »
« Edited: November 12, 2020, 12:46:51 AM by 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 »

Hillary's campaign messaging was better suited to OK in 2008 than in 2016.   Bernie's campaign messaging was better suited to OK in 2016 than in 2020. 

Also some of these are protest votes from people who will vote GOP in the Nov election.  In 2016 Bernie was a good protest vote bc he did not represent the D establishment, but in 2020 he was defined more readily as left-wing Democrat.
Logged
Woke Frenzy
Hades
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,526
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 13, 2020, 07:55:02 AM »

The only problem with that analysis is that Biden was tied even more to Obama as his own VP.

There's one simple reason for that paradox: Unlike in 2008 or 2016, there were several candidates on the ballot, which made a plurality win for Biden possible.

I've mentioned this phenomenon several times before. Many white Southern Democrats simply despise their own party and want to express their hatred by casting a protest ballot.
That same phenomenon can be discovered in West Virginia and Loving County, Texas, too, where they even switched from Obama '08 to one of those "Democratic" troll candidates (Bob Ely) in 2012.

Keep in mind that in 2004 neither Kerry nor Edwards won Oklahoma, but that military guy from Arkansas (Wesley Clark) who became Hillary's campaign manager four years later.


Michigan is an anti-bellwether state, too, when it comes to Democratic primaries, having chosen candidates from a wide ideological range including George Wallace and Jesse Jackson. But the Michigan Democrats don't seem to be trolls, unlike their Southern brethren.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,419
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 13, 2020, 08:00:23 AM »


They didn’t have a problem with Hillary in 2008 though,

Hillary wasn't Obama.

And so on.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 10 queries.