Nixon '72 in the South (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 09:04:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Nixon '72 in the South (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Nixon '72 in the South  (Read 5275 times)
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
« on: June 12, 2006, 07:22:36 PM »


Yep, that about sums it up. I think Democrats can blame McGovern for their long history of losing. He brought to life the extremist wing of the party and took it over. Since, there have been 2 democratic president...one was landslided in his run for re-election. The other, while making history in 92', had the luxury of running against Bob Dole in 96'.


McGovern was more of a war hero than any of these warmongering chickenhawks will ever be.

You can't be a hero and garner 17 EVs against Richard Nixon. Those are called failures.

McGovern certainlly was a war hero during World War 2. And as others have mentioned, I don't see how one's heroism is determined by what percentage of the vote they got in the Presidential election.

As a Presidential candidate, yes, obviously he was a failure given his poor performance.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2006, 07:25:30 PM »


Even that is under-statement. A lot of people seriously questioned the man's sanity. Nixon didn't have to campaign at all for that election.

I remember watching an All in the Family episode where Meathead inherited $400 and donated it to the McGovern telathon because the Democrats didn't have enough money: now that's just sad if it's true.

Well, it's realistic. This was the last Presidential election before the current system of partial public fianancing for campaigns came into effect. Nixon vastly outspent McGovern in the campaign, the last one in which both parties didn't have equal amounts of money to spend after the conventions are over as is the system today.

It's also worth remembering that McGovern's election showing was obviously harmed greatly by Watergate. He still would have lost by a decent margin even without it (which is why it was particularly stupid for Nixon to do what he did; I guess he wasn't satisfied with just a large victory, he absolutely had to have a massive win), but it helped turn him into an embarassment.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.