NBC/Marist NC: Biden +6
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:30:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  NBC/Marist NC: Biden +6
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: NBC/Marist NC: Biden +6  (Read 7280 times)
WD
Western Democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,576
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 30, 2020, 12:15:57 PM »
« edited: October 30, 2020, 12:34:39 PM by YE »


Marist's final polls had McCaskill at 47% (she got 46%) and Donnelly at 45% (he got 45%).

Quote deleted by moderator

They were still wildly off margin wise. Also, if a Candidate gets a lower share of the vote than your polls show (like with McCaskill) then theirs something wrong with your polls.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 30, 2020, 12:16:29 PM »

The fact that 538 had Marist as a A+ pollster after there misses in 2018 is LOL

Their ratings are more based on methodology, with only a % going to results. Marist ticks off most of the what you'd want for top level methodology.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,301
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 30, 2020, 12:17:20 PM »
« Edited: October 30, 2020, 12:34:03 PM by YE »


Marist's final polls had McCaskill at 47% (she got 46%) and Donnelly at 45% (he got 45%).

Quote deleted by moderator.

They were still wildly off margin wise. Also, if a Candidate gets a lower share of the vote than your polls show (like with McCaskill) then theirs something wrong with your polls.

A 1% lower share is utterly insignificant statistically.

Being off margin wise doesn’t matter so much if you have a candidate over 50%. Trump could get all the undecideds and still lose.
Logged
Holy Unifying Centrist
DTC
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,207


Political Matrix
E: 9.53, S: 10.54

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 30, 2020, 12:18:33 PM »



The college education rate in North Carolina is 38.1, so 40% is not off by at all.

Where are you getting 38.1% from? Wikipedia says 30% (29.9%)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_educational_attainment
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 30, 2020, 12:23:45 PM »



The college education rate in North Carolina is 38.1, so 40% is not off by at all.

Where are you getting 38.1% from? Wikipedia says 30% (29.9%)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_educational_attainment

Statistical Atlas
Logged
new_patomic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,217


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: October 30, 2020, 12:24:22 PM »

The 2019 census estimate is 30.5 percent of NC has a Bachelors or higher.

While the electorate probably does skew more educated than the state as a whole, 40 percent is too high.
Logged
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: October 30, 2020, 12:25:06 PM »

Interesting disparity between this poll and internal Democratic anxiety over the state >>

Logged
new_patomic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,217


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: October 30, 2020, 12:26:37 PM »



The college education rate in North Carolina is 38.1, so 40% is not off by at all.

Where are you getting 38.1% from? Wikipedia says 30% (29.9%)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_educational_attainment

Statistical Atlas

Okay I see where that's coming from.

They're including people with an associates degree.
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: October 30, 2020, 12:28:18 PM »



The college education rate in North Carolina is 38.1, so 40% is not off by at all.

Where are you getting 38.1% from? Wikipedia says 30% (29.9%)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_educational_attainment

Statistical Atlas

Should be noted that Statistical Atlas' education numbers are only for people 25 and older (which probably would be closer to what the electorate would be than simple % educated as a share of the state's population).
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: October 30, 2020, 12:30:15 PM »

Interesting disparity between this poll and internal Democratic anxiety over the state >>



You skipped this tweet.

Logged
redjohn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,685


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: October 30, 2020, 12:32:22 PM »

It says a lot that I also thought this was a national poll and my heart dropped... at a *6 point lead*.

Anyways, NC is lean Biden, maybe likely.
Logged
Asta
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 646


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: October 30, 2020, 12:32:41 PM »

The fact that 538 had Marist as a A+ pollster after there misses in 2018 is LOL

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/weve-updated-our-pollster-ratings-ahead-of-the-2020-general-election/

I hate to agree but you're right. Marist did horribly in 2020 primaries as well.
Logged
Pollster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,758


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: October 30, 2020, 12:57:32 PM »


Marist's final polls had McCaskill at 47% (she got 46%) and Donnelly at 45% (he got 45%).
No.  they had Mccaskill at 50 and Donnelly at 48.

They most certainly did not:

Indiana they had Donnelly 45, Braun 42, Brenton 7, Other 1, Undecided 5
Missouri they had McCaskill 47, Hawley 44, Campbell 3, Crain 2, Other 1, Undecided 3

Republicans in both appeared to benefit from third parties underperforming their polling (as they almost always do) and winning over most undecideds (common in safe states for the dominant party).
Logged
Pollster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,758


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: October 30, 2020, 01:00:49 PM »


Marist's final polls had McCaskill at 47% (she got 46%) and Donnelly at 45% (he got 45%).

Quote deleted by moderator

They were still wildly off margin wise. Also, if a Candidate gets a lower share of the vote than your polls show (like with McCaskill) then theirs something wrong with your polls.

Margins are close to meaningless in polling, and a 1% over/underperformance is statistically insignificant unless you have a margin of error of less than 0.5% thanks to rounding, which you don't achieve until you have a sample size of ~13,000.
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,776


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: October 30, 2020, 01:02:51 PM »


Marist's final polls had McCaskill at 47% (she got 46%) and Donnelly at 45% (he got 45%).
No.  they had Mccaskill at 50 and Donnelly at 48.

They most certainly did not:

Indiana they had Donnelly 45, Braun 42, Brenton 7, Other 1, Undecided 5
Missouri they had McCaskill 47, Hawley 44, Campbell 3, Crain 2, Other 1, Undecided 3

Republicans in both appeared to benefit from third parties underperforming their polling (as they almost always do) and winning over most undecideds (common in safe states for the dominant party).

You are both right - they had two variants for the final poll, ones with named third parties and ones without. Among likely voters, the ones with named third parties had the results you've posted and the others had McCaskill 50, Hawley 47, "Other" <1 and Donnelly 48, Braun 46, "Other" 2.
Logged
Bootes Void
iamaganster123
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,682
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: October 30, 2020, 01:13:19 PM »
« Edited: October 30, 2020, 01:22:43 PM by Bootes Void »


Marist's final polls had McCaskill at 47% (she got 46%) and Donnelly at 45% (he got 45%).
No.  they had Mccaskill at 50 and Donnelly at 48.
They also had Evers in Wisconsin at 53 but Marist isn't a bad pollster, they weigh by region. You need to mix it up, some can weigh by region, others by education to get a good average overall
Logged
Roronoa D. Law
Patrick97
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: October 30, 2020, 01:40:29 PM »

If all the blue avatars have left is (blank) was wrong in 2016 or FL 2018 then they're in trouble.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: October 30, 2020, 01:42:18 PM »

If all the blue avatars have left is (blank) was wrong in 2016 or FL 2018 then they're in trouble.

IN 2018, MO 2018, TN 2018, WI 2018 gov and to a degree FL 2018 for Marist.
Logged
Roronoa D. Law
Patrick97
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: October 30, 2020, 01:46:10 PM »

If all the blue avatars have left is (blank) was wrong in 2016 or FL 2018 then they're in trouble.

IN 2018, MO 2018, TN 2018, WI 2018 gov and to a degree FL 2018 for Marist.

Oh no Biden is in trouble of losing MO, TN, and IN.
Logged
Hope For A New Era
EastOfEden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,729


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: October 30, 2020, 02:02:51 PM »


Marist's final polls had McCaskill at 47% (she got 46%) and Donnelly at 45% (he got 45%).

^^ important to note
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,817
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: October 30, 2020, 04:14:33 PM »

Insane margin. I guess it will be closer, especially since this poll has almost a 5% margin of error.
Logged
Gone to Carolina
SaltGiver
Rookie
**
Posts: 227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: October 30, 2020, 04:32:22 PM »

As long as they refuse to weight by education I will not trust Marist.
Logged
philly09
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,107


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: October 30, 2020, 04:41:50 PM »

As long as they refuse to weight by education I will not trust Marist.

Pretty much this.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,705


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: October 30, 2020, 04:46:52 PM »

As long as they refuse to weight by education I will not trust Marist.

Very good point. This poll seems a bit too bullish on Biden, but it does cancel out Trafalgar at least.
Logged
bandg
Rookie
**
Posts: 151
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: October 31, 2020, 01:03:45 AM »

Marist in 2018 was truly horrendous across the board.

Donnelly +2, actual Braun +6 (8 point error)
McCaskill +3, actual Hawley +6 (9 point error)
Evers +10, actual +1 (9 point error)
Dewine Tied, actual +4 (4 point error)
Gillum +4, actual Desantis +0.4 (4 point error)
Nelson +4, actual Scott +0.2 (4 point error)
Sinema +6, actual +2 (4 point error)

Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.068 seconds with 12 queries.