Redistricting Competition? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 01:15:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Redistricting Competition? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What state should we do? (only large states with 2016 results)
#1
Georgia		  
#2
Florida		  
#3
Texas		  
#4
Wisconsin		  
#5
Michigan		  
#6
Arizona		  
#7
North Carolina		  
#8
Other		  
#9
Multiple states (post in thread)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 22

Author Topic: Redistricting Competition?  (Read 2400 times)
It’s so Joever
Forumlurker161
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,009
« on: October 28, 2020, 09:39:25 PM »
Sounds interesting!
I am still a redistricting rookie, definitely seems like a fun exercise.
The rules sound okay to me, but maybe another poster would have better insight.
Logged
It’s so Joever
Forumlurker161
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,009
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2020, 08:15:59 PM »
Huh...looking back at my TX map I may actually have a shot.
I didn’t cut up the RGV too much both because my gut said there was going to be a Hispanic swing, and because I wanted to keep a degree of compactness so I had more room to cut up DFW.

My border districts were (from East to West)
Clinton+11.6
Clinton+29.1
Clinton+5.1 (and this one has Zapata LOL)
Clinton+18.7
Clinton+40.4 (I didn’t break up El Paso)

It looks like I went for 28 Biden districts because I played it safe(ish)
Hopefully my opponents tried to Max out the RGV.

My NC map also was a 2-11 attempt but I doubt it will hold because of the Robeson area swing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.