Do you believe a constitutional amendment is? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 04:50:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Do you believe a constitutional amendment is? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Too hard to make a new one?
 
#2
Too easy?
 
#3
or just about right
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 45

Author Topic: Do you believe a constitutional amendment is?  (Read 795 times)
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,247
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
« on: October 24, 2020, 03:55:30 PM »

Probably too hard to alter the machinery of government provisions and about right to protect human rights protections.

I absolutely agree with the new guy here. I'm extremely wary about anything that could tamper with the Bill of Rights (and most other rights for that matter, of course). However, I do think the overall structure of the federal government is in massive need of reform and updating. The only significant constitutional changes that have been made on that front since the founding are the 12th and 17th Amendments, the latter obviously being of much greater significance.
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,247
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2020, 06:45:14 PM »

Probably too hard to alter the machinery of government provisions and about right to protect human rights protections.

I absolutely agree with the new guy here. I'm extremely wary about anything that could tamper with the Bill of Rights (and most other rights for that matter, of course). However, I do think the overall structure of the federal government is in massive need of reform and updating. The only significant constitutional changes that have been made on that front since the founding are the 12th and 17th Amendments, the latter obviously being of much greater significance.

Not to disagree with your overall post, but I'd argue the effects of the 12th Amendment were still pretty damn significant in & of themselves, given that who knows what kind of crazy-ass mishaps would've resulted had the original Electoral College formula's defect (that if each elector followed party tickets, there'd be a tie between the 2 candidates from the most popular ticket) not been corrected.

I did consider that actually, but it's largely confined to how the individuals are elected. That's also true of the 17th, but I do agree with those predominantly on the right that it was a serious restructuring (and ultimately a limitation) of the power that states had over the federal government. Unlike those on the right, I don't think that was a bad thing. I think it's only a shame they didn't go even further back then. If we can't have a parliamentary system in this country, I would definitely prefer to see either the Senate abolished or its powers severely weakened (and I would also argue that the Presidency needs to be massively reined in as well).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.