This entire thread lacks the context of why and how France got to this position, which can be surely blamed on several intertwining factors
1. The deterioration of the outskirts of French metropolitan areas by the central government
2. Rise of Islamism appealing to dispossessed youths
3. Poor job market
4. “European“ Francophone chauvinism (Racism)
5. Accelerated Dismantling of the Welfare state
But noooo, clearly the very existence of these people is a cause of this Murder—material conditions be damned.
so you're saying that if:
1.France didn't let suburbs go to hell
2.France had no dispossessed youth
3.France had a good job market (to do that they'd have to do things you'd hate)
4.If Euros and Frenchies were never racist
5.and if they slowed their dismantling of the welfare state (I didn't know France was "dismantling the welfare state", but I must say that is great news if true)
you think if all of those things were true, it would be safe to draw pictures of Mo (pbuh) in France? 'cause I don't think it would.
It's interesting that in a list of blames for this, it only includes faults France has made and none for the racists that encouraged this man to murder someone...or, ya know, the murderer himself.
Second question, should people be able to draw pictures of Mo (pbuh)? What if they do it in an insulting way?
