Civiqs/Daily Kos: Hickenlooper +11 (CO), Cunningham +6 (NC), Warner +11 (VA) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 01:27:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  Civiqs/Daily Kos: Hickenlooper +11 (CO), Cunningham +6 (NC), Warner +11 (VA) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Civiqs/Daily Kos: Hickenlooper +11 (CO), Cunningham +6 (NC), Warner +11 (VA)  (Read 1424 times)
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,589
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

« on: October 15, 2020, 06:58:15 PM »

Gardner was the prior NRSC chair when they gained seats. That's the ONLY reason.

And a lousy one at that (half-hearted/no involvement in MT/WV/OH where Republicans were badly outspent/defined early, prioritizing AZ and especially NV over more winnable races, not pushing for Jenkins in WV, etc.). The headline shouldn’t have said "Republicans score big wins in Senate", it should have been "Republicans fail to lock Democrats out of Senate majority until 2022."

Their only impressive win was FL, and that had nothing to do with Gardner and everything with Scott's $$$/strengths as a candidate.

And Nelson's incompetence
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.