North Carolina (NYT/Siena): Biden +4 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 08:38:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  North Carolina (NYT/Siena): Biden +4 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: North Carolina (NYT/Siena): Biden +4  (Read 1768 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,405


« on: October 14, 2020, 12:12:00 PM »

Classic Siena with all the undecideds, but looking good for Biden.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,405


« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2020, 12:24:55 PM »

Nate has decided to give his reasoning for not pushing undecideds:




what the christ
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,405


« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2020, 12:42:36 PM »
« Edited: October 14, 2020, 01:20:57 PM by The scissors of false economy »

Is Cohn seriously arguing that voters don't know who Trump and Biden are?

Believers in democratic self-rule: We should have faith that, absent unprecedented voter suppression or some sort of coup by the outgoing administration, the voting public that looks set to repudiate this disastrous administration will, in fact, repudiate this disastrous administration.

The pundit/political-pop-scientist/NYT editorialist caste, plus various doomers on talkelections dot org slash FORUM:


Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.