VA - Daniel Gade internal (R): Warner +7%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 10:31:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  VA - Daniel Gade internal (R): Warner +7%
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: VA - Daniel Gade internal (R): Warner +7%  (Read 655 times)
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,771


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 13, 2020, 05:19:38 AM »

The campaign's last poll, conducted September 22-25, had the race at Warner 51%-Gade 41%.

Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,811
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2020, 05:23:05 AM »

Here we go again, Warner under performed in VA in 2014 we are seeing tightening in VA just like in MI
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,575


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2020, 06:43:12 AM »

If his internals show him up 7%, that means this race is safe D.
Logged
woodley park
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 788


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2020, 08:21:01 AM »

For what its worth, I am seeing a ton of Warner ads on Hulu but have yet to see a single Gade advertisement. My wife and I were just talking about how we didn't even know who Warner was running against.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,937
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2020, 09:26:33 AM »

If his internals show him up 7%, that means this race is safe D.

Not only that, it means Warner will win by double digits, probably by a similar margin to that of Tim Kaine in 2018. And what I find interesting is that Warner's Republican predecessor, John Warner (no relation)-who narrowly beat him back in 1996-has endorsed him for reelection. The Republican Warner also supported Abigail Spanberger back in 2018.
Logged
Woody
SirWoodbury
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,047


Political Matrix
E: 1.48, S: 1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2020, 09:27:51 AM »

Lean D.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,468
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2020, 09:29:43 AM »

If his internals show him up 7%, that means this race is safe D.

It never was anything different than Safe D.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2020, 09:37:21 AM »

Vibranium D.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,991
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 14, 2020, 05:39:05 AM »

Looking forward to that 2014-2020 swing in this race.
Logged
vitoNova
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,268
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 14, 2020, 11:50:03 AM »

Every other ad on the Youtubes I'm seeing is from Mark Warner. 

And I can't skip them. 
Logged
mijan
Rookie
**
Posts: 167
Bangladesh


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 14, 2020, 03:20:27 PM »

Safe D
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 14, 2020, 03:34:14 PM »

If his internals show him up 7%, that means this race is safe D.

Not only that, it means Warner will win by double digits, probably by a similar margin to that of Tim Kaine in 2018. And what I find interesting is that Warner's Republican predecessor, John Warner (no relation)-who narrowly beat him back in 1996-has endorsed him for reelection. The Republican Warner also supported Abigail Spanberger back in 2018.

The 1996 VA SEN election must have been a very confusing one. “Vote Warner! No, WARNER!”
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,067


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 14, 2020, 03:39:08 PM »

Lol.
Logged
Roll Roons
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,985
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 14, 2020, 03:47:01 PM »

If his internals show him up 7%, that means this race is safe D.

Not only that, it means Warner will win by double digits, probably by a similar margin to that of Tim Kaine in 2018. And what I find interesting is that Warner's Republican predecessor, John Warner (no relation)-who narrowly beat him back in 1996-has endorsed him for reelection. The Republican Warner also supported Abigail Spanberger back in 2018.

The 1996 VA SEN election must have been a very confusing one. “Vote Warner! No, WARNER!”

"Mark, not John".

Someone mentioned how this year's Montana Senate race was one of the few competitive federal races where both candidates are popular, but I imagine this one was another.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,937
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 14, 2020, 08:14:13 PM »

If his internals show him up 7%, that means this race is safe D.

Not only that, it means Warner will win by double digits, probably by a similar margin to that of Tim Kaine in 2018. And what I find interesting is that Warner's Republican predecessor, John Warner (no relation)-who narrowly beat him back in 1996-has endorsed him for reelection. The Republican Warner also supported Abigail Spanberger back in 2018.

The 1996 VA SEN election must have been a very confusing one. “Vote Warner! No, WARNER!”

"Mark, not John".

Someone mentioned how this year's Montana Senate race was one of the few competitive federal races where both candidates are popular, but I imagine this one was another.

I agree with both of you. 1996 was the only election, after his initial election in 1978, that John Warner faced a significant electoral challenge. In 1984, he won with 70% of the vote, and in 1990 and 2002, he did not even have a Democratic opponent. And in 2008, Mark Warner garnered 65% of the vote against Jim Gilmore, in his second-and successful-bid for John Warner's seat (that of course was the year the Republican Warner retired from the Senate). Mark Warner isn't going to do as well this year, but I can easily see him garnering between 55-60% of the vote, like I noted above.
Logged
MATTROSE94
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,803
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -6.43

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 16, 2020, 10:41:32 PM »

A user on this site named New Tennessean Politician told me not to underestimate the unbeatable titan Daniel Gades chances (*sarcasm*).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.231 seconds with 13 queries.