CBS/YouGov: Greenfield +4 in IA, Peters +3 in MI
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 10:59:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  CBS/YouGov: Greenfield +4 in IA, Peters +3 in MI
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: CBS/YouGov: Greenfield +4 in IA, Peters +3 in MI  (Read 2353 times)
VAR
VARepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 11, 2020, 09:41:04 AM »

IA
Greenfield 47%
Ernst 43%

MI
Peters 47%
James 44%

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-trump-opinion-poll-michigan-nevada-iowa/
Logged
SnowLabrador
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,577
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2020, 09:42:44 AM »

LOL at Greenfield winning by more than Peters.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,744


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2020, 09:47:21 AM »

The undecideds in Michigan really lean D, especially with younger voters, Indies, and Blacks (for ex Biden winning Blacks 92-7 but Peters winning 84-6) so I'm not worried.

Yet another poll for Greenfield though. More Rs are undecided than Ds but Indies have even more undecided so it'll likely come down to them.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,775
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2020, 09:50:27 AM »

Greenfield continues to lead, it would be kind of funny if Ernst and Graham were to lose and Collins and Tillis survives
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2020, 09:51:00 AM »

IA-Sen is Lean D.
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,771


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2020, 10:00:19 AM »
« Edited: October 11, 2020, 10:08:56 AM by TiltsAreUnderrated »

Polled by YouGov
October 6-9

IA
1022 likely voters
MoE: 3.5% for likely voters

Greenfield 47%
Ernst 43%
Someone else 2%
Not sure 8%

MI
1181 likely voters
MoE: 3.3% for likely voters

Peters 47%
James 44%
Someone else 1%
Not sure 8%
Logged
VAR
VARepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2020, 10:01:41 AM »

Recent YouGov Senate polls:

Greenfield +4
Cunningham +10
Perdue +5
Cornyn +8
Peters +3

NUT  Smiley #CandidateQualityMatters
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,478
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2020, 10:03:26 AM »

Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,522
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 11, 2020, 11:30:35 AM »

Would be wild if Greenfield and James win.
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,801
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2020, 11:32:00 AM »

Would be wild if Greenfield and James win.

Greenfield and Harrison winning, with Peters and Cunningham losing is objectively hilarious
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,775
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 11, 2020, 12:04:46 PM »

But Indy Rep said Ernst was safe Iowa has retail politics😭😭😭
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 11, 2020, 12:09:10 PM »

Some of these MI-SEN numbers are a bit disturbing. However, I also think Biden’s MI number is likely a little low here. And undecideds seem to be favorable for Dems. I doubt Peters ends up losing, but did not expect to see Greenfield running ahead of him in any poll.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,587
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 11, 2020, 12:10:03 PM »

I am more disturbed at the Michigan number than pleased at the Iowa number
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,816
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 11, 2020, 12:11:57 PM »

cue michigan panic
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,522
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 11, 2020, 12:13:12 PM »

Some of these MI-SEN numbers are a bit disturbing. However, I also think Biden’s MI number is likely a little low here. And undecideds seem to be favorable for Dems. I doubt Peters ends up losing, but did not expect to see Greenfield running ahead of him in any poll.

James is simply a really good candidate.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,775
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 11, 2020, 12:16:43 PM »

Some of these MI-SEN numbers are a bit disturbing. However, I also think Biden’s MI number is likely a little low here. And undecideds seem to be favorable for Dems. I doubt Peters ends up losing, but did not expect to see Greenfield running ahead of him in any poll.

James is simply a really good candidate.

McComb county has alot of Gun owners that believe in right to carry and been upset with lockdowns, but Biden isn't hated in the Midwest, that's why he will lose again, just like he did In 2018. He hasn't lead in most poll except his internal poll
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,744


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 11, 2020, 12:18:55 PM »

Some of these MI-SEN numbers are a bit disturbing. However, I also think Biden’s MI number is likely a little low here. And undecideds seem to be favorable for Dems. I doubt Peters ends up losing, but did not expect to see Greenfield running ahead of him in any poll.

James is simply a really good candidate.

The problem for James is that I believe 44% is the highest he's ever gotten though. It appears that is close to his ceiling.
Logged
SenatorCouzens
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 267
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 11, 2020, 12:29:02 PM »

Some of these MI-SEN numbers are a bit disturbing. However, I also think Biden’s MI number is likely a little low here. And undecideds seem to be favorable for Dems. I doubt Peters ends up losing, but did not expect to see Greenfield running ahead of him in any poll.

James is simply a really good candidate.

The problem for James is that I believe 44% is the highest he's ever gotten though. It appears that is close to his ceiling.

Even against Stabenow (who is definitely stronger than Peters) in 2018 (a great year for Democrats) James got 45.8%.

Logged
Penn_Quaker_Girl
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,361
India


Political Matrix
E: 0.10, S: 0.06

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 11, 2020, 12:31:04 PM »

Some of these MI-SEN numbers are a bit disturbing. However, I also think Biden’s MI number is likely a little low here. And undecideds seem to be favorable for Dems. I doubt Peters ends up losing, but did not expect to see Greenfield running ahead of him in any poll.

James is simply a really good candidate.

The problem for James is that I believe 44% is the highest he's ever gotten though. It appears that is close to his ceiling.

Even against Stabenow (who is definitely stronger than Peters) in 2018 (a great year for Democrats) James got 45.8%.



What are your thoughts on this race, Couzens?
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,587
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 11, 2020, 12:31:33 PM »

I think Peters is going to win by 2-4% margin, he's really getting saved by the national environment.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,217


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 11, 2020, 12:47:05 PM »

I wonder how Slotkin would have done if James just decided to run for house.
Logged
OBD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,575
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 11, 2020, 12:50:34 PM »

If we lose the Senate because Peters gets Nelson'd, I'm going to lose it.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,744


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 11, 2020, 01:08:46 PM »

This is also a bit of an outlier, but the last 5 polls here (A/B rated) average is Peters +5.4, which doesn't sound too far off
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 11, 2020, 01:09:48 PM »

IA definitely won’t vote left of MI, but some of us said all along that neither Peters nor Ernst was safe. Wink I’d still say Peters is favored given the environment, but I wouldn’t rate this more than Lean D, and James winning isn’t out of the question. IA is still Tilt R, but it’s pretty hilarious that some thought Ernst was “the next Grassley” or would win by 20-25 points.
Logged
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,696
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 11, 2020, 01:12:24 PM »

Make her squeal
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.062 seconds with 13 queries.